Terrorism isn't as bad as drunk driving deaths!

Are you sure? This section is moderated heavily.

 

Thats not true Katy..
They do not baby feed people, but they do moderate this forums...

 

Where did she say that??

 

Don't mix up the two of them.
Afghanistan was a reasonable war.
If Bush invaded Darfur to save the ethnic people there, that would have been a justifiable war too. But then all the oil there is in Chinese hands who are the current bankers of the world, whom Bush won't cross.
Iraq war was/is no way justifiable. Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism before the invasion. Saddam was a dictator. But so are most of the leaders in Middle east.

They are responsible for their stupid decisions. So they should be considered as murderers or terrorists. The later as they tend to bring terrible/terrifying accidents in to the life of normal/law abiding people.

 

1) Americans have killed more number of civilians than Sadam.

2) Americans have suffered many more casualities than they expected.

3) Americans's never found WMDs. Its fascinating that before war they always said WMDs existed but could never say where exactly they existed.

4) Before going to war they created their image as saviours of IRAQ but now they are hated by Iraqis and many others in the world. Even many of the americans themselves oppose this war.

5) Even after 4 long years no peace has been brought to Iraq . Americans have turned it to a graveyard and the worst part is -- nobody is picking up the responsibility that the whole thing was misunderstood and mismanaged.

6) And at last ... this mess was created just because of oil and since war oil prices have soared up quickly. US is unable to control the rising global oil prices.... nobody gained from this war .

 

No no... I believe you, I just wanted to know if it was public statement.
Since its a PM, you should have not made it public IMO.

Anyways I know it for a fact before you posted.
As I said they do not baby feed. But still moderate the forums.

 

What offical link would you like? A page from the Whitehouse? That was the official findings of Michael Chertoff of U.S. Department of Homeland Security. I thought that all those news articles would have been sufficient for you.

You did but you also said

Which goes against Michael Chertoff's findings. Something you need to tell us? Do you have an inside terrorist source that the U.S. do not have?

Did you actual read that article or are you just believing what you want to believe in?

 

The posting history of a moron in this thread:

 

Are you saying shes just as bad as you Gstring?

 

I am still waiting for your answer HISSY SISSY, what is the reason that you don't serve in this war:

1) "medical"
2) convicted felon
3) loud mouth sissy

 

Might as well answer my questions too, if you're waiting for answers from other people, eh ?

Here's a question for you
And here's another one
Oh boy, and another!

 

yeah, she is clueless about what she's talking about

 

They do moderate. Every now and again someone comes in bans the idiot AnthonyCea. It's always a happy moment for me to see that.

 

I totally agree. Anthony is just a "guruSEO wanabe".

Rob

 

Put me down for which one you think is best, or all three.

 

to gwhirled, no answer is ever good enough...all he can do is criticize, not support...