Talking about terrorism surely he should mention who's doing it? Try doing this with osama infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels ---- war -- jihad -- infidels lol i think you get the point
The point is what ever a speech is about it is bound to contain the words relating to the speech. This thread is pointless but fun, yet many think it's GREAT lol
Yep! Could you imagine if a group actually said something like: I can just imagine how many here would rush in and say: That's racist! You're a bigot! You are filled with hate! You are a hateful person! This is why muslims are mad at the world! There is no place in this world for that kind of hatred! This is unspeakable! Islam is a religion of peace! And...I'm sure, a few other choice words But, when we look at it from a different perspective, and see how those words are really used, and replace "muslim" with "unbeliever," "infidel," and other choice words, suddenly there is no outrage. It's perfectly acceptable. Surely someone will mention the obligatory "all" card?
Panama Invasion: PANAMA INVASION PANAMA INVASION: JUST CAUSE. NICE NAME BY THE WAY. THEY ALWAYS USE "IN THE NAME OF DEMOCRACY." BUT THAT GUY IS STILL POPULAR IN PANAMA. FUNNY THERE IS ALWAYS BE SOME REASON...JEWS...COMMUNIST...ON ON...ISLAMIST....
Interesting post, but it should be noted that it was a speech on the topic of terrorism... What bugs me about it, is the consistent use of "Bin Laden" when it's convenient for him; even after saying "So I don't know where he is, nor do I spend that much time on him": http://youtube.com/watch?v=4PGmnz5Ow-o
That is an interesting speech.The country should catch Osama bin Laden and end the war asap.the nation should focus on economy,that is the key,that is the point.
He is one of the failed flops like GTech who supports fraud, Blair, Bush and Cheney out of intense hate of Muslims. Cheney loves Muslims, he is moving in with them, if you can lick em, lick em !!! Looks like Cheney and Blair sold these Republican zealots down the tubes, but they are all about money anyway, so they could not care less about their supporters, they are just suckers to be used like cattle are used by ranchers.
I'm honored that you have addressed me. I have never addressed you before as i can clearly see you are really gone mentally, your on par with Gworld. I thought AGS was bad but you & Gworld make AGS appear sophisticated. Condemning muslim hate & terror attacks is not hate of all muslims is it? Not unless all muslims are terrorists & when i condemn one terror attack, muslims get offended, this is what your saying, right AC?
Bush is a bad president. He wasted billions on a war, and is still sending us useless propaganda, the same stuff he sent just before we started the war. Bush is a failure. Rob
TooCrazy, it is simple, guilt by association, anyone who agrees with GTech on anything here is a member of the lunatic Nixon gang, you are now a member in good standing Son. You are good at mopping up for the failed Republican propaganda gang and have made a name for yourself in the same fashion as WhenGTechWas16 !! Great work you crazy old bloke !!!