There's no point explaining differences me & Ronny, he's a wacko who want's the truth but can't accept it when it's right there in front of him. Now would you like a go: Could you explain why you support him? and explain where your beliefs and Paul's differ if at all.
Apparently you have no idea what he is about. What you do know is the rhetoric you hear from GT. He gets his info from the smear attempts from big corporate interests. Why did Ron Paul make such a big splash at the debate? Not because of a few Digg'rs like some here would like you to believe. He made such a big splash because he stands for core conservative values. Not the faux values of these new conservatives or the neo-cons. Not this faux Christian conservative rhetoric that people have bought into and thrown their votes away. Not this big business/big government faux conservative ideals. Not this imperialistic ideal that is the fervor of the new faux conservative "patriot". The whole ideal of meddling in the worlds political business to perpetuate an agenda is going to cause some terrorism in your direction. Then to call a war on something that your policies have increased is only a way to further implement your style of government through the need to be saved from the very people who put you in this situation. Do we not see the insanity of this yet? Or do people still believe the rhetoric of them "hating our freedumbs...." But back to your question.....I suppose you missed the title "Why I support Ron Paul" then neglected to watch the short video. But I believe in Ron Paul's stance on the limiting of the federal government. I believe in his stance on not letting his campaign and his vote and his agenda to be bought by corporate interest through huge campaign donations. I believe in his stance against the war in Iraq and the future war in Iran. I agree with his ideals of returning this country back to the ideals set forth in the Constitution by our founding fathers. I agree with his stance on doing away with the current, corrupt monetary system and doing away with the Federal Reserve. His stance on the worthlessness of our credit driven monetary system and the inflation "tax" that is stealing our wealth when the fed creates money (called federal reserve notes now) out of thin air to then charge interest on for private monetary gain. For anyone that dosent know the federal reserve is no more of a federal agency than federal express is. It is simply a private central bank making money by creating money. Some of the main points I differ with Paul? He believes in, and follows through with, not raising any taxes period. I think this is a bit extreme. Yet is shows that nobody ownes Paul. He does not make vague campaign promises only to flip when he needs to pay back his contributers. Ron Paul has no masters and proves it. Like when he says he will not vote to raise taxes.......and never does. Even though the federal income tax is in direct proportion to the interest owed on the national debt to the private bankers of the central banks (money made out of thin air btw, money that you pay for in inflation as well) I don't totally agree with his fight against the IRS. The Federal Reserve act is in direct relationship to the implement of the IRS in 1913 but the way the funds are apportioned currently it is an unfortunate need. So these are some of the major issues I agree or slightly differ from Paul. So where do you differ?
I haven't noticed much real criticism of Ron Paul's actual beliefs. It's more a matter of "trutherism" and other non-arguments.
Exactly. It is all parroting the propaganda. How else could you explain this answer over and over again?
I really like what you said there except for the 'fight against the IRS'. The federal income tax is illegal and unconstitutional. As a matter of fact there is no law stating you have to pay taxes on your labor. See: F2F
There was alot of damage done to the constitution that year. In December of 1913 the Federal Reserve Act was passed.
Well, it was the year before satan was cast out of heaven. http://wrestedscriptures.com/b07satan/revelation12v7-9.html I think the income tax was the last straw for God. And I don't blame him. The IRS is truly the work of the devil.
Yes, creating money in response to the outrageous fiscal policy, not for "private monetary gain." The Fed cannot keep the revenues from interest on government securities. Go past the operating income on the Fed's income statement, and you will see a section called "distribution." The US Department of the Treasury does not allow the Fed to make a profit on every security that they purchase. It is a conspiracy that the Fed directly profits from its operations. The only power that the Fed has is to act in favor of its member banks, which they do, but they have not abused that power.
Here are a bunch of your fellow Ron Paul supporters: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/ron-paul-one-388512p127.html
Support for RP has a very strong anti-semitic tilt to it. It's disguised under a non-interventionist foreign policy, but when you look deeper, it's just antisemitism. I think you'll find it on this forum and other places. Trutherism has deep roots there, too, so it runs very much hand in hand. Doesn't even take long: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=4377166&postcount=1275
I agree. This was extremely evident when the lefty moonbats kept pushing theories that the Mossad was behind the attack on the World Trade Centers.
I agree as well....however, we all know that Ron Paul actually thinks that George Bush ordered the attack...just like he orders gas prices to go up and forest fires to start....