The thread's title says it all: does this website (see link below) violate Google AdSense policies/terms?? And here's the link of/to the mentioned website: http://www.partyschoolnetwork.com/ tayiper
Hmmn maybe meant the images being around the ad block? Dont think thats a problem. Gotta love the keyword stuffing on the blue bar
click the campus life link 1. hes got an image by google ads. 2. Hes part of the Bravenet traffic exchange
I don't see anything wrong with it. It is crowded with ads (I understand it's your revenue) but as a visitor I would be discouraged.
No no, this is not mine, it's just some website that I've stumbled upon a few days ago. Yeah and I see that I should be more specific in my question. I was thinking about the content, i.e. all the content are three blocks of ads that even look like normal (site-owned) images/links, and that's a bit deceitful IMO. tayiper
Nothing that I can see, maybe move some of the images further away from the ads, that's it really, not sure.
Errr, and I must apologize one more time; you see it's that I see now that this website (that I posted a link to above in first post) is even not the one that I had in mind originally. I will post a correct link as soon as I (re)discover it. tayiper
Well, it in fact it was the right website, just not the right page, and btw. I still haven't found it (i.e. the right one, where they possibly violate AdSense policies/terms), damn ... tayiper
i had searched this on google many blog writers have reportedly said that itwas not adequate for a adsense programme
i did not see the think that you mention. but is against the tos. people are not allowed to use so many keywords on the pages which adsense ads stays
OK folks, I've managed to somehow find (though some Traffic Exchange) that particular page; here below is a thumbnail screenshot of it, of course, click for a larger image. That page's thumbnail screenshot: tayiper
Well as I mentioned above: almost all the content on this page are three blocks of AdSense ads (that even look like normal site-owned images/links), and IMO that's a bit let's say "deceitful". tayiper