Al-Qa'ida 'moving to blast American city with N-bomb'

GTech is filled with hate ??

He is just a reflection of the Republican party platform, that is why Republicans are hated worldwide, because of the people who populate the party like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and GTech and company here on DP.

 

There was no doubt. Which one do you believe was most difficult for saddam?

Some people are intimidated by the amount of source and facts I have on hand that dispute their silly claims. Perhaps the smell you are experiencing is coming from a spell of gas. I recommend one of these.

 

Black market is not like you are imagining in movies. Black markets and stuff like this do not have proofs, I was saying what world has been whinning for 15 years.

I told you, we do not have enough budget to search each and every corner of our 800,000 sq. kms country.
But we definatly act against them once we find them.

 

Who are you cheering for again?

 

It's not about budget. Pakistan will not search for bin laden because they are afraid of the repercussions if he is caught. If it were about budget, the US would more than pick up the tab.

 

LOL, I have always said you were a better comic than Republican propagandist GTech, you should start doing stand up man, you could make it with that material man !!!

Facts you have on hand? How about propaganda from the RNC on hand ?

Those are the facts you have, and this is the truth !!!

You can't even answer questions GTech !!!

So you keep spewing more propaganda to baffle em with bullshit, good for the signature sales though !!!

 

Hmm, the propaganda card again? Let's see what google says:

http://www.google.com/search?source....com+AnthonyCEA+propaganda&btnG=Google+Search

Looks like it's time for a new strategy. You've worn that one out.

 

You do, many of them http://www.ex-christian.net is one

Pure BS! As I can tell from first hand experience.

 

Do they live in fear of being killed, as in islam?

I place no value upon your word. That's the best you have to counter with? "because I say so?"

 

You're not a propagandist GTech !!!

At least not a very good one, you never have been, especially when you can't answer questions but use diversions to avoid them, that is part of your forum scam too, in addition to promotion of hate.

 

Thank you. You always have the kindest things to say. I'm flattered that you have chosen me to project your own shortcomings upon. I'm always there for you

 

You can't even make excuses anymore GTech, let alone provide answers to questions, because you do not have any logical answers to defend criminal conduct by those you support in the White House.

 

I wont even consider a youth or a woman a terrorist, if they are not indulge in any terrorist activity. I am not denying that allied forces didnt kill civilians.
But the points I am trying to make are

1) its not their goal, they regretted and apologized every time they did it.
2) Tens of thousands are way too much for innocent civilians killed by allied forces.

You are not making a valid point. If US was/is in insane hands they wouldnt think this much, would they? Why wasting time and money and lot of troops when a single nuke can do the job?

See they are not insane.

I beg to be differ, Pakistan never pledged nor accepted 'No first use' or 'No use against non-nuclear country' policy. If you have any link or source that points to explicit statement. please provide, I'll gladly correct myself.

Why do you need proof from me? You, yourself admitted you're not happy about Allied force invasion in Iraq and Afghanistan (Why not counting Yugoslavia).

Everyone wants peace, except for few radicals.
But we dont get everything we want, do we?

 

OK, lets keep my point of view aside. You tell me the number of innocent civilians killed by allied forces.

Trust me, Its a valid point. A lot of countries were already not in favor of that undue wars, why would US get whole civilized world against itself for using nuke when they can do everything without using nukes.

Let me give you an example. You are one guy with muscles, good height etc. And someone with smaller height, physicaly weak tries to rob you on the road bare handed.

You have pistol as well. Would you simply shoot him or will fight physicaly to make him run?
Since he is weaker and you are sure you can make him run .. you will do more effort and fight physicaly other than doing less effort and shoot.

Do tell me what you will be doing.

I guess you are right, Pakistan have not accept NFU.

Ok does that mean nukes in Pakistan are in insane hands? Lets see what 'other' insane hands have nukes.

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use

So US, UK, Israel, France are also insane hands? lol ..

Five countries have not accepted no-first-use pledge. Don't they all deserve invasion according to your defination of insane hands?

Would you like to change the defination of insane hands now? May be some other defination can declare Pakistan as insane and all the other nine as sane.

thanks for extending my information to NFU btw.

Being unhappy from invasions and being afraid of nukes are two different things. Aren't they?

I am not afraid by nukes of other countries, because I know we have not done anything bad to them. You are afraid because you know what you have been doing

I am unhappy with those invasions because they are affecting the peace of world indirectly and of Pakistan directly.

Ya, we dont.
But atleast we can be unbiased and find the root reasons of why we are not getting what we want, peace in this case.

 

I am not sure about the exact no, that is why I kept asking for statistical proof of numbers, and that is why I do not give the exact no too. From what I can speculate I find 'tens of thousands' is much higher than the actual no.

If I am sane, I wont shoot him. Most prolly, I'll get rid of him and hand him over to police.

But if I am insane, I dont see any reason for not to shoot him.

No, no you got me wrong, I am not proposing that Pakistan is in insane hands either. (Well I dont find prez Mush to be most intelligent person on earth , but definitely sane as of now). But I cant say the same for Iran or Iraq.

Additionally Pakistan is one of the places where terror farms like AQ or Taliban can get Nuke technology from. How you would ask, Nuke Scientist A.Q. Khan isn't a forgotten Chapter. Now thats what I call insane.

I think we misunderstood each other on this point.
As it doesnt making any point to me. We are afraid of nukes? Whose nukes and how?

I am also very unhappy with those invasion, and wish they had never taken place. But we were forced to do so.

 

Well, the original article was about "will Al Queda use a nuclear weapon against the US".

The answer is - of course - YES... but only if they could get one.

They lack the technical skills to build a TV set, let alone a NUke. However, they MIGHT be able to buy one off Russia. Wether they would be able to detonate it is another matter.

Meow Purr.

 

Actually the US is all over things like that. In fact, case in point, a bunch of Chinese made "Thomas the Train" wooden toys were recalled.. The notifications and instant ban on the product was quick and completely overwhelming...

The difference here is that in the US, responsible corporations do the job the government cannot or will not.

 

Russia is selling Nukes? any source? I might buy one, just in case..

 

I don't have statistical proof either. A little search came up with:

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualties_of_the_U.S._invasion_of_Afghanistan

Even if we ignore that, 20-30k seems possible figure to me when you do carpet and cluster bombing, use daisy cutters.

There you are. You have answered your own question asked in this post

US wasted a lot of time, money and troops instead of the nuke for the same reason you used your hands instead of gun. Both did not want others to point finger at themselves but wanted the job done at the same time. So, nukes were not used because they were not required.

Think the above example other way, if that robber guy is more muscular and more in height than you .. chances of using the gun by yourself would rise, because you would know you cannot beat him bare handed.

Got my point that why US did not used nuke in those wars and why did US used in WW2?

Well, you said kind of that in this post
You were diffrenciated sanity and insanity on the basis on NFU policy.

This makes sense, how? Let me tell.

US invaded Iraq saying they have weapons of mass destruction etc etc. This is how you are afraid nukes.

OK, you were forced to do so.

Were you really forced to do that to tens of countries 73 times in last 60 years?

Why on the planet any other country were not forced to do that any where near to that figure, 73.

May be not you, but your govt. is surely wanting to overtake the world in one way or another. They want to make the world unipolar.
This is what I understand from whats US is doing around...