Al-Qa'ida 'moving to blast American city with N-bomb'

This is the way the world works. The media hear something and pass it on and by the time it has reached us it is all rubbish and we start to believe it all

 

I didn't have a question. Who is using the "all" card?

Is that what you are trying to do? Using "all" as a shield? If it's not "all" then it's ok?

So by *your* standard, "all" must have aids before scientists work on a cure. "All" must have cancer before we start treating *some*

Please, don't even try that game.

 

I think I have posted enough on here now and believe that you believe what I have said even though you are pretending you don't.

Takecare

 

No, you are not the world. I'm sure your ego believes you are, but that's another story.

 

I'm still trying to figure out what the hell you are trying to say. Excuses for terrorism? Is that pretty much it?

Yeah, maybe it is time to go. I don't work with excuses very well.

 

They are the majority

Here's something from american protestants:

Proselytizing for another god

Religious Liberty

 

OK, YOU DOUBT that they will use WMD.

Who gave you the right to invade a country and kill tens of thousands of innocent people on the basis of YOUR DOUBT? Great post you made dude!

US already have used weapon of mass destruction twice. According to your statement US is the dumbest country on the planet. Or you people was dumb 60 years ago and now you think you are not? your post cracked me up. Really.

So do you got a magic stick to measure the probability of a country to use nuke? lol ..

Pakistan have nukes and one of the most powerful ones. Have we used it yet? No. Because we never needed to use one, but if someone will try to invade us, we will use it.

Six countries have nukes other than us, and we are not upset with them .. you know why? Because we know we are not going to F with them without any reason.
If we were treating the world like US is treating, we would be upset with the sex other countries with nukes.

Ever thought why zimbabwe, new zealand, portugal and countless other countries have no problem with 7 countries owning nukes, included one Muslim country? Reason is same as above. They are not treating other countries like shit so they are in peace.

Morale of the story: Do not invade others and don't fall in thread to get nuked. Simple.

Its mean you also agree that your nukes were in insane hands before 60 years? What is gurantee that they are still not in those same insane hands? You know why you not used them yet? Just because you did not needed after Pearl Harbour, you will be using again if you need. And this is what nukes are for.

You cannot justify nukes you own. Really.

Its mean your govt. don't do anything without approval from civilians? (unlike Saddam)
Its also mean US govt. bombed and killed tens of thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan with your approval?
OK, you (civilians) approved to kill thousands out there.

Why your civilians cry when terrorists counter attack?


PS. No offense friends, but I was not expecting such silly posts from both of you.
Sorry if any of my word hurt.

 

I could care less if they are the majority. The point you are failing to prove is laughable at best!

 

Hold up, slapnuts. Who gave your buds the right to invade Iraq from other countries and blow up people every day? Is this who you are defending? Every day in Iraq, muslims kill other muslims with car bombs, explosives and whatever else they can use. They kill muslims. And this is who you defend? This is who you want to take over Iraq? Your silence is deafening.

When will you be moving to Iraq to live under a terrorist dictatorship rule? You seem to wish it upon others while sitting in the comfort of your little safety zone, conducting digital jihad in the hopes for a few scrap virgins.

Please...

 

I'd love to see if Allied forces killed tens of thousands 'innocent' civilians. Please provide me statistical proofs.

Yes they did, It was first time. They under-estimated the power of Nuke. Once they saw the distruction they refrain from using it, No body did since then.
Did US use it in Vietnam war?
Did US use it in gulf war 1?
Did US use it in Yugoslavia?
Did US use it in Afganistan?
Did US use it in gulf War 2?

Answer - NO.
and besides it ended a world war, and prevented slaughter of thousands of more people.

Thats the Point 'if someone will try to invade we will use it'.
India also has the Nukes, And one of the Most powerful ones also. But it says, 'We will not use Nuke unless someone use it on us first', thats the difference between sanity and insanity.

Ohh you are upset with entire US allies, that includes every country that has Nukes.

Other countries do not behave like shit, there are many Islamic countries, US is not bullying each and every of them. but You seems to miss the point.

 

Oh my friend.

If you will bomb and invade Iraq, If you keep talking about invading Iran next .. do you expect their sympathies to be with you?

Get real bro, if you do bad to them they will be happy with anything bad happen to you. Whether its a terrorism attack or hurriane.

No way. We never facilitated terrorism.

We are a developing country and just don't have high budget to search each and every corner of our country to find what is going on where. Also, our security agencies do not have budget any where near FBI to keep an eye on every other foreign .. and so on.

But whenever we find any group involved in terrorism, we seazed their accounts right away and banned that org.

And by the way, if plan to crash airplanes in twin towers were made in US .. does it mean US providing its land for terrorism activities?

 

sure russians are selling nuke to chechens

nuclear black market ..... kid you watch too many movies...

 

Dont give us sympathy, that wont do any good. Get rid of them, that will certainly do your own good.

Ohh, ofcource being a Pakistani you'll deny this.
But just leave India aside.

USA, Russia and even China admitted that there are training camps in Pakistan.

 

The point i have proven is that Christianity, in both its forms, does not contain the same "Religious Liberty" that christians are wont to criticize Islam for not having.

abeyance

noun

The condition of being temporarily inactive​

 

How about your excuses for the Bush Administration and Cheney, seems you can't even answer anymore GTech and are flat out of reality based logic, seems your lies have caught up with you and you have no answers, just more rhetorical propaganda.

You love to gift wrap it all in the flag, to bad the American citizens do not agree with you or Cheney.

 

that was a nice post, what those sickos dont understand is they are killing their own people

 

I guess that's why we don't have a site dedicated to apostates of Christianity.

Meanwhile, Apostates of Islam live in fear, for the punishment for leaving islam is death.

Perhaps today is a good day to leave islam? Every day, 16,000 Muslims convert to Christianity, why not be one of the brave many?

 

I believe they understand it. They simply excuse it. One thing I've always admired about muslims is that they adhere to what Benjamin Franklin once said:

We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.

 

They should join your church Reverend GTech !!!!

 

lolz .. what made you think I am defending that? I was just asking him who gave ya right to invade a country on the basis of doubt you have that they might use WMD.

silly post *ignored*

GTech, I prefer not to debate with you. I smell hate in your talk. Please leave me alone. The Webmaster is much nice person to talk with. Thank you.

Ok, will you consider 4-12 years old children 'innocent'? will you consider a 70 years old women 'innocent'?
If you also consider them as terrorist, I am sorry allied forced did not killed a single 'innocent' civilian. May be all of them were terrorists.

US did not face loss like it did in WW2? You never feel like you are loosing the war. You have been fighting to weaker countries and most wars were thousands of miles away from United States. And when you could invade them with traditional weapons, why use nukes?

Pak govt. have always said the same that 'We will not use Nuke unless someone use it on us first' ..
and for what I said, my intention was of using it as last weapon. And this is why we and every other country made nukes. If it cannot protect you, your country, your freedom .. its useless.

I am just saying that, and its insane .. and you used that already and it was not insane .. dual-standard?

We are upset? How? Proof?

You seems to miss the point. As I said, I have list of 73 countries which US have bullied in last 60 years after WW2 .. I'd love to post that, but in separate thread.

Please do not close your eyes from the fact that your govt. is resposible for at least 90% of what is happening now a days.

I wish there is peace somehow, but it doesn't seems like happening without you do not start following very simple rule of nature. Treat others as you would like to be treated.