Fox, bush, Fox, bush, yada yada yada... All right. I see you condemn it, but instead of commenting anything on the OP or the matter you choose to go the same old way of dragging bush in everything. SO I take it as you only care to verbally condemn those deaths of children which are either fabricated or shown as killed by American Army, right?
Bush is a lot more dangerous than most people in the world GTech, an utter controlled puppet fool. Your problem is that you bash other people without even seeing the damage your lover has done to the Middle East. You so utterly fail to see the point I am trying to make to you FOX News mind controlled idiots. People like Bush and Blair have created a disaster of epic proportions and sent many fine young men and women off to be killed for nothing, not to mention the amount of innocent women and children that have been killed over there. But you don't see that as being a bad thing. You go on "AGS doesn't condemn this blah blah blah blah" but fail to admit anything bad that Bush and the corrupt cabal have created. Not even a bad word about Israel too. You only ever see things from one perspective, the one that the controlled mainstream media has taught you.
Yes, but sadly US foreign policy keeps feeding Pakistan new Laser guided bombs and munitions which they will NEVER use against terrorists, I wonder where they will be aimed at.......? (india) Atleast things are changing now..
Ah yes, using Bush as your shield again. The sad thing is, alex jones has convinced you this is true. Bad word for Bush for going after the people you defend, but never a bad word for __________________? Jewish genocide? No problem, we'll defend it? Stoning women for the crime of being raped? Not a bad word to be found. al qaida using mentally challenged children as suicide bombers? Let's defend the putz defending that! Hamas? Personal friends! Willing accomplice? No question about it. Spare me
True, however wouldn't you agree that was a silly post? What am I supposed to prove here, that Musharraf is a commando? That he's unable to see the long term effects of using force everywhere? That he rejected the agreement? All these things would be known to anyone who follows the news in Pakistan.
Well, the problem with people hearing these raving clerics and whatnot is that they don't think critically enough. I mean, has anyone actually really gone and checked out (objectively!) what he was saying to make sure that it is actually in line with what the holy texts preach? I mean, a lot of problems are caused by people blindly believing things these guys say without even thinking critically or doing fact-checking, hell some even think they even represent the views of mainstream (and/or correct) versions of the faith (when half the time they don't).