Supplemental Result Question

Discussion in 'Google' started by Kavaler, Jul 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. seomax

    seomax Banned

    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    mvandemar if you think that duplication has nothing to do with supplemental index then can you tell us the reason why pages go in supplemental index.?? according to you
     
    seomax, Jul 10, 2007 IP
  2. WunschShrek

    WunschShrek Peon

    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    yeah a few related quality links to your inner pages will get them out of supp. in time. It happens to every site when it is launched, just one of the starting hurdles of google. Not hard at all though.

    personally commeting on this, I have always been able to get pages with 40-60% duplicate content, out of supp's and ranking fine, by getting quality related links to the page and other inner pages. But not every page on this site is that high, it is a site where I sell a certain type of widgets, only 20 pages (items) out of the 110 I didn't re-write because the manufacture didn't provide good descriptions, so I just used his so it is all duplicate content. (The site is 6 months old and I now outrank that particular manufacture on most phrases, got out of supp's on this site 3 weeks ago, only been promoting for 4 months -- took 2 months to build).

    Inner links from related sites, and with on-page done right, you really can't fail. Buy some high quality directory links, i always get botw personally.
     
    WunschShrek, Jul 10, 2007 IP
  3. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #23
    Wth are you talking about? You're still saying it is related to duplication... it's not.

    Lack of PageRank/link strength, and it's not according to me, it's according to the way it actually works.

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Jul 10, 2007 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.