Don't call it insane if you don't comprehend. The number of days was basically from the time the problem (Osama's aggression) made itself known until 9/11. That's not an insane comparison. If there is a problem (increasing muslim aggression) you should not let it fester (as Clinton did). Aggression is the way evil regimes are stopped. You don't surrender with to them and say "please be nice to us".
If Clinton should be blamed for September 11th, shouldn't "the First Bush" (41) be blamed for the first WTC attacks? If you want to blame the people responsible for letting the "muslim aggression" fester, you'd need to blame everyone that persecuted them since their religion's inception. Including: Pagans, Christians, Mongolians, Communists... They're not being aggressive for no reason... They've been persecuted since the beginning...
Yes your right, aggression with cause aggression, that's why after Osama Bin Ladens latest aggression on 9/11 more aggression followed by Bush. Clinton was not aggressive enough thats why Osama Bin Laden did an attack on the WTC in 93 & then finished off what he started 8 years later in 2001.
Yeah, I guess he could have completed the job in Iraq and he probably had some info that there may be something coming from Osama. Muslims as victims of aggression??? That's almost funny in this day and age. Maybe from other muslims (see Darfur).
So where is bin laden anyway? Any news on him? Seems like he killed a bunch of Americans and he is just chilling somewhere
Bush doesn't care about catching him, remember? http://youtube.com/watch?v=4PGmnz5Ow-o But he sure is intent on keeping our troops in iraq.
Are sure that it was Laden in 93? I've heard it was domestic terrorist act, nothing to do with Osama...
So, you are saying 9/11 came up with just no reasons behind it, as just "I dont like America" ? The way I see it, is US interfere in Middle East, so they can reply, too. I would and you would too. Anyways, why dont they ask all these extremist idiots that are there, what they want? Anyone knows, what would they answer on that? But please, seriously, with no sarcasm. I bet noone even tried to do that.
What do the extremist idiots want? They want the destruction of Israel and the rest of us living under a Islamic dictatorship. Does this sound good to you? BTW, this thread was about Al Gore 3.0 driving 105 miles per hour through my neighborhood in a Prius.
Well, they dont say that to Russia, I wonder why? Cos we can solve problems without wars in other countries? I know that the thread is totally different, I am not the only one who started this talk So you think if you are going to help country A in a war against country B, country B won't start killing and hating you ?
Russia was under the Soviet dictatorship and there was a few dozens of millions of people killed by them. I have one older Hungarian friend who has part of a hand missing and a scar on his face from a Soviet hand grenade he almost threw back in time. Think of the extreme Islamic regime as a succesor to the Nazi and Soviets and maybe it will make more sense. Agression is is needed to stop these agressors.
That's 3.0 before he got illegal diet prescription pills from the worldwide information superhighway that Algore 2.0 invented.
There a reason for sure. Add a little bit of islamic extremism with a little bit of Clinton not aggressive enough (like i said earlier).
I know there is, but what is it? Maybe it's US's long nose that is walking in Middle East ? So what do you say, they scared of Russia or smth? They did blow up many times different cities, mostly Moscow. I am not sure what you are talking about.
so a prius running at over 100 is not using battery power, but gas instead....I bet this made daddy more upset than the drugs or other things.