well, you were arguing like you believed that they are your own and not from Iraq/Iran/somewhere near there .
That's not quite true is it? i suspect you know that though. You insisted in defense of these attacks that they were carried out by: poor lil men, who most probably came from a bombed out house in Iraq where all their family were killed & decided to take revenge upon the UK for all the wrong they felt. I insisted that your above assumptions are very highly unlikely, not that they were not british, remember now?
Anyhow, these lil men "could" have relatives all over the place there and it doesnt matter if this was done by the same lil man or his relative in 120th stage, the main point is that they have a reason for that. I know how muslims are united, it's not like other religions, thats the main strenght of it. What I was saying, is that them lil men who might lost someone, now will have nothing to do as to become another as you say "terrorist". And the gang will be more than happy to have them in their crew , that's just what they want.
And since you post saying one guy was indeed an Iraqi (although he didn't quite "fit your script") what have you done a part from justify the attacks on assumptions? In fact before any evidence was available you were screaming the terrorists are innocent or poor little guys from Iraq. Just stop the crap of trying to justify these attacks & say you approve of them
xoxo, you still didnt get that I approve them? I would do the same if my country was erased to sh**t. You would too, my friend. You thought you are gonna be safe sitting in UK and eating popcorn, while your troops are "fixing" some country miles away, plus an islamic country? Aint working like that. btw I was quoting your word "lil", that does not mean it was my word, you started to call them like that