The North American Union & the "Amero" currency

That's the wonderful thing about freedom. No one stops you from moving there, if you don't live there already

 

Its a shame someone would have to move from a country touted as the most free to pursue true freedom.

 

You are assuming a conclusion, aren't you?

I'm just saying that if you think canada is "more free" and you desire to live under their laws, feel free.

I don't believe the canadian's over reaching government is more freeing, do you? Taxes are higher. Police have more control over motorists there. Fishing is tightly regulated, as is motorcycle riding. Look at canadian regulations in my regards and you'll find this country far more free that what you have up there.

But as I said, if you feel that canada is more free than this country; no one stops you from standing on that greener grass.

 

people Of All Those Countries Should Be Given A Referendum To Decide. Not Some Few People Meeting Behind Closed Doors To Decide The Future Of So Many.

I DON'T SEE ANY BENEFITS TO THE POOR PEOPLE OF MEXICO OR CANADIAN PEOPLE AS A WHOLE. ONLY BENEFITS IS FOR CORPORATION TO EXPLOIT THE HUMAN CAPITAL AND CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES, BY INDUCING FEAR oF YELLOW AND OTHER PEOPLE MAKING CHEAPER STUFF ON SLAVE LABOR.

 

Cupid hits the nail on the head

 

GTech -- I am far from a conspiracy-type person. I do believe, however, that the differences you see politically in this USA are sharp on many issues with the exception of immigration. You don't have an immigration problem with the borders no longer carry the same meaning as they once did.

 

That's why, in order to enact any NAU conspiracy crap you'd have to pass a series of constitutional amendments to make it happen. That is why the whole argument is stupid.

 

Stupid is as stupid does, Momma always said life was like a box of capslocks, you never know who's gonna be a dolt.

 

”Countries are effectively told if they don’t follow certain conditions, the capital markets or the IMF will refuse to lend them money. They are basically forced to give up some of their sovereignty.”

Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia University Professor and Nobel Laureate)

 

This happened to some former soviet republics. Some of them needed assistance; so the IMF told them they had to get rid of mother's day and call it woman's day instead; lest the holiday offend non-parents.

 

And when the NAU comes in within the next few years you just know who will be giving you a ribbing lorien, that's right, your unca AGS.

It's already being pushed through, you're just completely oblivious to it (no surprise there lol )

 

AGS, do you really enjoy it when I debunk your posts? You must, since you bring up posts of mine in a vain attempt to make a valid point. Then, when you realize how wrong you are, you scurry away like a child. For the sake of your self esteem and your self-confidence, you should really quit.

Let's look at how an amendment gets passed, shall we?

Two methods:
Pass both houses (house and senate) by a 2/3 majority.
3/4 of the states must approve of it.

Second method:
2/3 of the state legistlatures must approve a constitutional convention
3/4 of the states must approve the amendment that is suggested

Given that no one, left or right, wants to give up our soveirgnty to another country (over 50% of the population don't even want is involved in the UN), none of these majorities will ever be reached.

Also, given that it'd take a series of amendments to over-ride the power of the legistlative, executive and judicial branches - even if amendments did surpass the first barrier (2/3 of the houses of congress - and what congress is going to give up its legistlative power?) - then each of those would go to the states.

The last amendment to the constitution took about 100 years to ratify, and it was a relatively minor issue (pay raises). So, unless there is massive public outcry (lowering the voting age); it'll never happen. Will it?

Now, slink away from this thread before you look stupider than normal. K?

 

Just because it is not widespread in the controlled mainstream media that you so love, just because lemmings like O'Reilly and other complete fools are not reporting it does not mean that it is not happening. These idiotic fools just report what they are told to report.

The NAU is certainly not a conspiracy theory, which is the catch-all get out word that you and other members of the crazy gang use every single time.

 

I see. completely ignore the constitutional reality of the situation and blather on about your strange obsession with BO. If you don't have anything intelligent to add....

 

I can see this being the last thing Bush does before he leaves after a disastrous 8 years in the WH. A legacy for him, of course you sheeple will be up in arms about it, but it will be your own stupid fault for conceding so much power to these corrupt fucks.

Oh lorien what are we going to do with you?
You are so wrapped up in the false reality that has been created that you are wide open to being abused by the very same scumbags that you so resolutely defend. When the NAU comes in I will be the first person to send you a PM and say, "I told you so."

 

I was there... We didn't need any assistance, we were just told that we need it.

Same thing has been happening in Africa, the leaders who agree to destroy their middle class and replace free economy with 10 planks to Communist manifesto are guaranteed a chunk of money from IMF. Paid for by American taxpayer

 

If he can't pass an immigration bill how do you expect him to create a NAU?
Couldn't reform Social Security either. Regardless of the fools around here calling him a dictator (and I am not saying he doesn't seem to try sometimes) he doesn't have that kind of power. If he can pass a bowel movement in the next year I will be impressed.

 

Again. constitution. 100 years for last amendment. Is it really that difficult?

If it doesn't happen by the end of his term, will you eat chili dogs?

 

It's not even a secret lorien, the WH website publishes it, but the mainstream media that is so utterly controlled does not tell idiots like you about it. Out of sight out of mind.

March 31, 2006
President Bush, President Fox of Mexico, and Prime Minister Harper of Canada in Press Availability

Click Video (Real) for the clip.

The thing is (as I have said) is that this is all going on under the American public's nose but some Americans are too dumb to see it happening.

Remember this acronym lorien: SPP (The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America) because that is what will create the North American Union. Great news for them Mexicans, I would expect quite a few of them coming over!

This Google Vid might wake you up a bit, it's a bit slow to start with but will give sheeple like you a better idea of what is going on behind the scene and what the mainstream media will not shout about, because it would cause people to actually think for themselves.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2268341860482102257&hl=en

Here is an article on the next SPP meeting in Canada lorien, don't expect the mainstream media to pay any attention to this, just like the Bilderberg meetings.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56264


As an afterthought lorien please try and understand that just because something is not covered by the mainstream media does not mean that it isn't happening. The sheeeeple are only told what the sheeeple need to be told, for anything else you need to actually think for yourself. It might be difficult but trust me you will figure it out in the end.

In a couple of years time you will thank me for waking you up to the BS going on right under your very nose.

 

I can see that GT is peparing a reply to this thread, let's see what cobblers he'll come up with.