Terror attack foiled (some will be angry haha)

anyone who doesn't agree with {terrorist George Bush and his corrupt cabal} is a {terrorist supporter}

 

How about those that actually defend them? I'm sure you've seen *someone* doing that before, even today

 

Only you GTech with your continual support for Bush.

 

If anyone is addicted to or is obsessed with Bush it's you, nobody else even talks about the guy (only in response to you bringing him up) you bush lover

 

Using bush as your shield again?

So far, you have outrage for the media and outrage for Brown. Remind me again, who have you not had outrage for, again?

 

Yeah, he uses him as a shield to change the subject away from who he is supporting, yet again.

What a sick and twisted excuse for a human being.

 

Yeah I'm not too keen on him either. Even though Cheney is worse than him as the President he has to be held responsible, he should be tried with war crimes along with Tony Blair right now before thousands more lives are needlessly wasted.

 

But there's no need to stop terrorists?

 

I dont, we all know the reason. If UK want to stick its nose with Bush's together in any country they want, then why be suprised if something blows up on your yard ? Ohh...wait, who would do that....hmmm, lets think, maybe some aussie dude?

That's what I am saying. You will never get out of water dry

Here is the proof that you are late in thinking, read up before its too late:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=385119

There is, but not with a dumb action of sending troops. Why not blow the whole country up then like they did in Nagasaki? No one would care anyway from the US administration side.

Take a look at Russia, did we send any troops to other country ?

 

Trust me, using or citing terrorism as a way to get a country to change it's foreign policy is sorely mistaken and just plain wrong.

The Bristish people have lived with terrorism for years and are used to it. If anything attacks just polarise more people against the terrorists cause in the long run.

Apart from the tabloid newspapers hysteria, the weekend attacks have only had the effect of giving us some pretty funny monday morning jokes about the lengths that smoking-ban protesters have gone to.

Having said that I don't believe that the terrorists (or at least the people that control them) want or expect it to change the west's foreign policy. The attacks are aimed to drive a wedge between the west and law abiding Muslims living over here, something that would benefit many people on both sides, but people on either as a whole.

 

I can understand your despair at the west for retaliating against muslim assholes like in Afghanistan, i can also understand your frustration with the Iraq situation being as your muslim, but what you should do is just say that instead of shifting blame

 

This guy's becoming a bit of an internet legend

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2007/06/30/sot.glasgow.smitten.eyewitness.cnn
http://johnsmeaton.com/

 

I wonder if people are getting jealous? Or if they are glad there was an eye witness? Maybe some of both.

Looks like this guy has become pretty hot too



He's probably burning with envy, eh?

 

LOL, I just got sent this too

 

That's the best thing about the attacks, that muslim being toasted

 

He does seem a little hot under the collar.

Maybe mr terrorist should put pants on if he wants to kill more infidels today.

 

guys dont be so simple.


these are planed by mi5 to blackmail islam and muslims and create an excuse for longer iraq invasion.

 

It's a conspiracy!

 

well, you still cant read my post:

I dont give a sh*t about Afghanistan/Iran/Iraq , but I also dont give a sh*t about UK if them countries fight back, any country that starts a war, deserves the payback. Simple ?

So dont make a face like you did nothing wrong.

 

this is the PRIME EXAMPLE of what is wrong with the world...no one gives a sh*t....how about trying to respond rather than try to blame?