looks like the "religion of peace" is once again calling for the destruction of the USA and Israel...this time al-qaida is backing Hamas, and calling for more muslims to do the same. Is anyone surprised? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6237314.stm
Curious AGS. What is the source of your disbelief? Do you think that Hamas and AQ have different goals or something that'd make such a merger illogical or is just kneejerk reactionism? Secondly, it's fascinating to watch you disbelieve things when the evidence is right there, in front of you, but you spout of ridiculuous conspiracy theories that have no proof and that can't even be supported under scrutiny. It's like you disbelieve reality and believe fantasy. Why is that?
Hardly any of these dodgy al-CIAda tapes are ever checked for authenticity lorien, and they are released very periodically to keep sheeple like you convinced.
Yep. That's, of course, the common sense explanation. Cheney releases a tape every 3 or 4 months to make sure that the 10 people paying attention to their release are kept in line. Or it could be that they are actually releasing tapes themselves. Either or. I mean, really, both are equally plausible.
The bottom line is that they are released to the mainstream media that quote them as bonafide but always add a disclaimer, usually it's "the authenticity of the tape could not be immediately established" yet push the story as fact and as I said before the sheeple just lap it up because they are too stoopid to question it.
So do you disagree that AQ and Hamas would like to partner up or do you think their goals are dis-similar? What makes this connection so impossible in your mind?
Historically, a link of compatible goals between two terrorist groups has not been required in order to create simpatico. Terrorists share one common thread, regardless of region, creed, or politics. The use of extremism and violence against civilians in pursuit of their goals, whatever, and no matter how divergent they may be.
Which makes it even harder to believe that AGS thinks a link is impossible or unthinkable, doesn't it? He just kneejerkedly believes his version of reality, without even thinking about it.
Interesting. More aid and comfort to terrorists by asserting they are not responsible for their crimes and that it's a CIA conspiracy that has no foundation and that you've been proven wrong over, time and time again. Are you referring to the type of "authentication" used for alex jones and dylan avery conspiracy movies? That kind of "authentication?" So in essence, you are upset with muslims for conspiring to work with the CIA to produce videos of threats. Perhaps you believe that US animation companies are so advanced, that they can create these muslim characters on video saying the things they are saying? I had no idea you were so upset with muslims for conspiring with the US to keep everyone shaking in their boots. See how strange that sounds? Uh, well, to a normal person? Oddly enough, the same mainstream media that you accuse of using advanced top secret animation techniques to create the illusion of muslims speaking on film was perfectly acceptable just a few days ago, when it fit your needs: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=375076 Which one of these from the "sheeple/brainwashed/mainstream media" database would be most appropriate for such an occasion, AGS? Absolutely devoid of any reality, what-so-ever
Don't get too carried away GTech you are far from a normal person. You offer support to terrorists like Bush (amongst others.) I love the way that as a last resort you always refer to Alex Jones, or dig up some post of mine (or even yours ) as some kind of attack move on me. It does sound a lot like you are clutching at straws. Bush has ruined the Middle East within a very short space of time and that upsets me, and seeing you offer support to the lying terrorist scumbag also upsets me.
go hamas go al qaeda, blow up as many israelie jew scums and americans as you can! it will make my day
Hmmm, looking above, there are some "crap posts." Interesting which one you chose to address, isn't it?