U.S. Troops Discover And Rescue Orphan Boys Left Starving, Chained To Beds

Then for once in your life, you would be a man instaed of a moron and admit to the facts.

 

And you would say something positive about the US

 

It seems you are the one who don't reads or understand it. Here is the quote from your source:

If these children were involved in conflict then why did they need to deny it at first? Why is it called collateral damage? Wouldn't they simply say that they killed 7 terrorists instead of 7 children?

What does acceptable collateral damage by choice means? Isn't the same as we are ready to kill women and children if it servers our military goals and isn't this exactly the same line of logic as terrorists?

Now try to pretend that you are HUMAN and repeat after me:

" I CONDEMN ALL KILLING OF CHILDREN WHO ARE NOT SUICIDE BOMBERS AND POSE NO THREAT TO THE MILITARY"

Or be honest and admit that like your friend Gtech, you only see children as a propaganda tool and you don't give a damn about how many children are murdered.

 

I support 64th Trimester Abortions for Emo teenagers.

 

What type of compound was this a school?

 

Yes, I know you apparently believe this. You are projecting again. You have a problem with certain actions, but no apparent concern for other situations. Which is a great point, in and of itself.

That is what I keep asking you, but for some reason, you will not answer.

Are those kids in a terrorist camp legitimate targets if they can get a bigger target? Yes or no?

And, again, is hiding behind kids (done countless times by Hamas/Fatah) legitimate, yes or no? And when this happens and a kid is killed, who do you blame?

I'm not asking any tough questions. Why do you consistently refuse to answer.

 

Any proof that it was a terrorist camp, let's look at your own source for the article again:

let's look at this from another point of view:

In your opinion if a U.S. general visits a church or school, does this make the church or school a legitimate military target? I am sure in 9/11 there were some people in the tower who were involved in military, do you think that terrorist were right in attacking the towers and killing innocent people because according to your logic those buildings were also a military target?

Every soldier has the right to kill in it's own defense and in the combat situation but killing civilians because it is convenient and call it collateral damage is exactly the same ideology as terrorism. I don't agree with terrorists, no matter what uniform they have or don't have, how about you?

 

Like over here, when you said you were not going to support terrorists anymore and when given a fresh opportunity, just disappeared? Gasp! Oh no, gworld doesn't like to answer or say a bad word about his buds? But he "demands" that others do! Oh, the outrage and hypocrisy!

 

Here is a quote from the real source:

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3995

Where as the media use unsourced "heresay" that you are clinging to, here we have it straight from source.

 

I am giving you a chance again to pretend that you are a HUMAN and actually give a damn about children, repeat after me:

" I CONDEMN ALL KILLING OF CHILDREN WHO ARE NOT SUICIDE BOMBERS AND POSE NO THREAT TO THE MILITARY"

 

AGS, did you want to reconsider saying a kind word for the US troops that found the orphans?

Probably not, huh?

 

No, I'm giving you a chance, to say a bad word about your buds (not a made up blanket CAIR approved statement):

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=3128407

Did you want to say a bad word? Yes or No?

 

Gworld we know you condemn the actions of the army as these children was innocent, but do you condemn the terrorists for hiding behind these children & using them as a shield which caused their deaths?

 

We aren't talking about a church or a school are we, gworld?

We are talking about a soldier hiding behind kids firing on troops. Do they have a right to self defense or not? This is a very real situation.

We are also talking about kids in a terrorist camp, most likely training to be future bombers themselves. This, again, is a real situation. If OBL, say, always keeps kids around him, does that make him off limits?

Let me get this straight. Hamas soldier hides behinds some kids and starts gunning down israeli soldiers. Israeli soldiers fires back and kills the soldier and maybe kills the kids. And -he's- the terrorist, in your eyes? Or, at best, they are on equal footing? That's a solid belief system, there. Do you really believe this? In your eyes, it'd be a far better situation if the soldier lay down and die? Again, you are legitimizing the tactic and encouraging it more often.

So, in your desire to help the kids, you are putting even more in harms' way. I don't see how you be happy with that.

 

LOL. Poor you, lorien1973 and toopac who were defending the killing of children until now but now even military doesn't defend it's actions and just claims that it was a mistake and they didn't know.

"Sorry we just killed 7 of your children by mistake"

Now that even army admitted that such actions are not acceptable, you will have the chance again to pretend that you are HUMAN and give a damn about children, repeat after me:

" I CONDEMN ALL KILLING OF CHILDREN WHO ARE NOT SUICIDE BOMBERS AND POSE NO THREAT TO THE MILITARY"

 

I condemn ALL kind of terrorism that involves civilians in the military conflicts. While civilians die as a result of military conflicts and combats, no one has the right to kill or torture civilian population in pursuit of military and political goals by choice.
This is part of Geneva convention that regulates military actions against the civilian population.

 

Which means we can safely conclude terrorists hiding behind kids are not at fault for any harm or deaths caused to the kids & the terrorist can't be targeted at any cost.

But if Jews hid behind kids to stop gun fire then they are just stupid people (not that hiding behind children would stop the people Gworld sees nothing wrong with)

 

That is exactly what we are talking about, it was a mosque (equal to church for Muslims) and madrassa (persian and arabic word for school).

How does a person hides behind children against missiles? What kind of danger a person on the ground and sitting in a room can pose to a missile or an airplane?

Just stop the BS, you are digging yourself deeper and deeper.

 

What kind of nonsense are you posting? Where did I say what you are claiming as my opinion. Just stop with your BS posting and try to think, it is already obvious that you are a moron, don't make it worse.

 

So you believe any terrorist hiding behind children is unacceptable & they are wrong for doing this & they are to blame for any deaths that occur? A simple yes or no answer will suffice instead of a general blanket statement as you normally do.