You could be right maybe he just "strange" (Matt) & just has a "wild viewpoint" (DeniseJ) & just simply believes all terrorists are innocent & are just being picked on by the evil USA government, UK government, AUS government etc Now we can agree to disagree lol...
Do you mean now you can start calling me a terrorist too because I am defending a "terrorist supporter?" Let's hope that's not what you mean. Because I am really attempting to give you the benefit of the doubt here.
"You could be right maybe he just "strange" (Matt) & just has a "wild viewpoint" (DeniseJ) & just simply believes all terrorists are innocent & are just being picked on by the evil USA government, UK government, AUS government etc" The above what i wrote is straight up facts & being 100% neutral, please point out what's wrong with it? Why would i call you a terrorist supporter? you don't think firing rockets into Israel or blowing up people is ok do you? In fact i said this to you: Why keep digging, do you have a problem?
No. No problem. I just wanted to clarify. It's hard to tell over the computer what other people mean at times. I'm sure you can understand. I'm honestly not trying to start anything. Thanks for clearing that up
"anyone that disagrees with {insert something here} is a {insert something that is probably true anyway, here}" card Anyone that defends terrorists is an automatic friend of Matts
Or: anyone that disagrees with {AGS} will never understand the importance of {Alex Jone's information} anyone that disagrees with {AGS} will never understand that {all terrorists are innocent} anyone that disagrees with {AGS} will be called media sheeple {even though AGS's views match the medias 100%} anyone that disagrees with {AGS} will never {get the support of Matt}