Here's comes the spin doctor; No Matt you was waiting for proof that he defends them that it posted above. Yes he can, even if he said he supports them fully, but he's responsible for his actions & what he says. The actual problem is this Matt; not only does he not get behind the "baying mob" he doesn't even remain neutral, he defends terrorists at all costs by claiming they are innocent, they were set up, the governments did it, it's a false flag etc, he sounds like a lunatic. Any body with half a brain can tell what he defends, supports & doesn't support, i don't even know why you waste your time trying to convince people otherwise.
So defending people's guilt mean's that they support their views? We'd better send the anti-terrorist squads out to round up those lawyers and barristers Yes, people are responsible for what they say, but I still haven't seen any support So you're doing his thinking for him now are you? Yep, I'll just learn to go along with the baying mob mentality like Nazi Germany
Why do you think he always claims terrorists are innocent in every single thread? because he hates them? because it doesn't bother him? & why only terrorists? does he claim kiddy fiddlers are innocent no etc Well maybe when i blow up something i can get AGS to not support me by claiming i'm innocent? If that's not support i don't know what is.
Toopac is one of these clowns who thinks any argument can be won by saying the word "terrorist". He doesn't have any actual basis for anything he says, So he tries to garner public support by attaching himself to a common cause. Toopac doesn't know history, He doesn't read books and everything he knows has been fed to him by right wing western media. It's sad that he is being brain washed in to doing the bidding of vultures that feed on blood and oil, And he doesn't even realise it. even family guy makes fun of Toopac and the other drones incapable of thinking for themselves
Being an angry muslim doesn't mean anything to me, just another follower of the true islam. Killed any jews today?
I have to say... I'm not seeing any terrorist support going on. And I'm not a cheerleader for anyone. Your alleged "proof" of AGS's support of terrorists escapes me, I'm afraid. I tried very hard to find where you were coming from... and I just couldn't. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. I haven't seen anyone in this thread express their opinions in a way that doesn't belittle, condescend, or otherwise disrespect the other person. AGS seems to be of the OPINION that those people are innocent. His opinions do not confirm that he support terrorists in any way, shape or form - not that I can see, anyway.
You will find that AGS has an inconsistant way of saying both that terrorists don't actually exist and that it isn't their fault, but that of the USA
I will form my own opinions regarding AGS when I have enough experience with his posts. For now, I fail to see where Toopac believes those threads offer proof that he supports terrorists.
And that supports them how? Granted he has some pretty strange views regarding peoples guilt and the role of governments, but I've never seen him actually support terrorism or terrorist acts. An I'm still waiting for a link to a post that shows this. As far as I've seen he takes the view that the governments are guilty.
Just read what I wrote without trying to add anything to it. Really it IS that simple. (Ask - what DID Debunked write?)
Strange indeed, so do you think he's just a looney or what? I actually like OBL, i just want him dead because i believe he's guilty of mass murder you may call this odd but is it any odder than not supporting terrorists but consistently claiming their innocence? I don't like Osama BTW
Terrorists do exist, all over the world, including in the White House. I despise all terrorists, it is just that people like you, GTech and other members of the crazy gang can't seem to see that, so you constantly post the same crap day in, day out. And I have never blamed the USA as a country, I blame the corrupt fools in charge of the USA for the disaster that they have created in the Middle East.
We mean terrorists that did 911 etc not the white house & all over the world like the UK government Not your definition of terrorists that's just for AJ fans.
Yes, he does. It's not the first time either. He's just bored. You could show him all day long and for the sake of arguing, he'd still deny it. Here's a few bookmarked posts of his last year: Matt on christians: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1146193&postcount=198 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1147467&postcount=277 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1212547&postcount=370 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1212577&postcount=373 stalking: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1250731&postcount=750 speaking out against islam: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1263323&postcount=33 defending terrorists: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1267067&postcount=165 doesn't get it: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1267148&postcount=183 taking action: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1267524&postcount=226 coherent argument - http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1488609&postcount=53 He's basically a milder version of AGS and he doesn't like Christians much. As you can imagine though, he was always defending *something* .