What an utterly ridiculous post. Mate, I can see you are losing the plot, let GTech take over and go and get some sleep man!
Since it's anything goes sources night, here you go: http://www.kenrahn.com/jfk/the_critics/griffith/Oswald_poor_shot.html
But they were definitely both patsys, why do you think Bush and the rest of the fuckers don't even mention or care about OBL these days? Because he served his purpose as the patsy. Don't even mention the "because he's hidden in Pakistan" bullshit because if Bush really wanted him that badly for the deaths of over 3,000 innocent people he would have made a far greater effort to find him no matter where he is. Time to wake up to the BS lorien.
Losing? Lorien is owning three anti-America nutjobs single-handedly. He damn sure doesn't need my help to own the likes of the three stooges! That's what happens when you let "troof" do your talking, instead of "truth." Your alex jones is fake and so is his conspiracy theories that you promote to absolve terrorists of their crimes.
Resorting to the Alex Jones line again eh GT? LOL that's all you say these days isn't it. You remind me of Bill OH NO Reilly that labels anyone that speaks out against 9/11 a nutjob. I can read you like a book mate, a "Bill O'Reilly Pocketbook!"
I believe his full quote is that "if I couldn't do it, then he couldn't do it it" right? A little bit of narcissism there. Here's the facts. LHO was a marksman, who could, at least, hit a target at 500 yards. Kennedy was 80 yards away (or less). Oswald had time to line up the shots - at least the first one - and get a good aim on as well. It is possible to fire the requisite amount of shots in the given time frame as well. You have absolutely nothing to contradict any evidence that's presented.
That you don't take issue with the other truth I posted about you and accept that you are a terrorist supporter and project your Bill O'Reilly fetishes on me via alex jones...I can live with that. That RP is also giving aid and comfort to terrorists by suggesting there is a coverup and pandering to people like you...some might call that treason. I just want to make sure that those who think RP is something special (let's see, it was one percent about a month ago, and it dropped to 0% a few weeks ago), see that it's nutjobs like you...people who support and defend terrorists, that are the backbone of his campaign. The same type of people he's pandering to. You and briant do a far better job of making him look kooky than I ever could. You're Ron Pauls worst enemy and you don't even realize it
When are conservatives going to stop saying shit like that? If this is a just war and the key goal is to eliminate genocidal governments (no matter the source of the killing agent) why is Darfur the way it is? I am not condoning the policing of the world, I just want an answer. I'm sure the reason will be purely monetary.
It sure is a step up from Fox Noobs. I think your, "I'm not a gun person" line was an understatement. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Hathcock I figured people who worship at the alter of the MIC would know who this guy was.
You've answered your own question. Would you like us to police the world or not? Secondly, are all other governments in the world incapable of doing anything? France has troops, china has troops, russia has troops. Curious that no demands are made on them to solve the darfur issue.
France has troops, China has troops, Russia has troops so why don't they want to go to war in Iraq. I mean, it is a just war, right?
So you are going to actually avoid the point, aren't you? France decided its oil contracts in Iraq were more important. Russia and china didn't want to be involved. Darfur is their chance to step up to the plate and do something, isn't it? Or do you mention Darfur as a cheap talking point?
Why do you consistently defend GWB and minimize the effect of American foreign policy upon the state of the world today? Do you think the innocent Iraqis feel a lot better about being raped by the soldiers who are there to protect them? Rape has long been a tactic used in war both to reward the soldiers and to demoralize the enemy. I'm not saying it is sanctioned, but it is a known by product of military aggression on foreign soil. Hence, it should be expected as a consequence and weighed into the overall impact of the war. I certainly don't think America is making friends by raping Iraqis. In fact, this may be a reason for someone to suicide bomb, wouldn't you say? This is what an occupied civilization does when it is oppressed. Remove the occupiers, encourage development, social services and education and these problems disappear. Unfortunately, we won't leave. We're going to be there in some capacity for generations. And the next Iraqi generation will grow up feeling they are the dogs, and we are the masters, which makes the task of nutbars like OBL to recruit all that much easier.
Why do you try to rationalize reasons for terrorists to blow people up all over the planet? Well, as long as there is a legitimate reason to set off car bombs outside schools to kill iraqis, outside hospitals to blow up iraqis, to use retarded kids as bombs. Hey, you've got yourself a winning argument! Yawn. The Iraqi government can ask us to leave at any time. And we'd leave if they wanted. We are not occupying the country. We are defending it from people who want to turn it into one of those islamic paradises where people are thrown off buildings, beheaded and oppressed. Is that what you'd like to see in Iraq?
you make me laugh lorien. You say things like "So you are going to actually avoid the point, aren't you?" and then you answer everyones questions with a question. Not only does that make you a gutless coward, It also makes you a hypocrite.
Says the guy who supports people who blow up schools, hospitals and who uses retarded kids as bombs. And have the nerve to call US soldiers terrorists
Says the guy so cowardly he can't even condemn the rape and murder of children by american forces.... You can keep trotting that line out all you want, I'll keep trotting out mine.. Who do you think sounds worse? The supporter of hamas? or the supporter of child rape?
I don't see Lorien or anyone not condemning when a US soldier does something bad, however bad shit happens in any war. I am not for the war BTW, it is simple stats. You put x amount of people in any given area, 1 is bound to be a bad apple who will commit a crime such as this. There is a difference from an act being ordered out by the top command, or someone doing it on their own....