So you say that all the info they gave to the world has been a lie and there hasn't been a hidden atomic project in Iran, huh?
I say that their information is as reliable as the information from Iranian government and they are as dangerous as Iranian government if not more so with their combination of Islam and "Socialism". We also should not forget the last time when the helpful bank embezzler gave U.S. "helpful" information about Iraq supposed WMD.
You are confusing me. There are 2 posibility: There is an atomic project in Iran which had been hidden for many years which in this case MKO has been a reliable source of information and told the truth. There isn't an atomic project which in this case I would be so relieved that would be ready to accept anything you say about any group you want. Now which one do you say is true? .
This is giving me the absolute shits now if i was the US government. I would toss half of you dummies out of the country. Because you are all negative, make up sources, have no proof. God dam it with that financial graph, it doesn't proove wrong, not every business declines during warfare. Look at all the steel and everything who produce for the government for war. Im not replying on here now. Because no matter what i say certain people hate the USA no matter what. For trivial and false reasons. Most of you would want saddam still in power raping, murderding and burying alive his own citizens. Finito
It seems to me that you get easily confused and it is no fault of mine. Both alternatives are a possibility since the "source" of your supposed information for alternative 1, is an Islamic terrorist group which is no better than Iranian government.
So you are not aware that the second possibility cannot be true, huh? It has already been stablished that the info that MKO gave the world has been true, SURPRISED!! Do you need proof from the sources that you dont' dare call "unreliable" .
How is it established that it is true? Do you always support Islamic terrorist groups (according to U.S state department) and try to pass them as reliable and trust worthy sources?
You are telling me that you are not aware that there had been a hidden atomic project in Iran? Then why do you think there has already been 2 resolutions against mullahs in the past 5 months? Read my next reply.... .
Reason better than this: Source: CNN You said: "unreliable source or information" but CNN says source of valuable intelligence Again CNN clearly says: Iran's secret nuclear program .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Mujahedin_of_Iran Leader of MEK with Saddam So what is your reason for supporting an Islamic terrorist group and trying to pass them as a "reliable" source? It seems U.S. government is really getting desperate. The last time with Iraq they just used a simple con man and bank embezzler as their "reliable source" while this time they are so desperate as to use people who are designated as terrorists by U.S. government itself.
OK, lets say that I agree with you and US has relied on an unreliable source out of despration , how about permanent and temporary members of security council? If the information that MKO provided was a lie then why there has been 2 resolutions in the past 5 months and there is going to be another one? You have already dismissed MKO and US government, I hope you approve of this source: United nation itself .
Have you read the text? It offers no proof that Iran is actually developing nuclear weapons and it only is in support of treaties that countries "should not" develop weapons and tries to force Iran to stop enrichment because it "may be" used later on for developing weapons. It was the same security council that passed resolutions against imaginary "WMD" in Iraq also while U.S. can veto any resolution that they don't like.
And how they did they realize that Iran was actually enriching uranium? Who informed the world? How did the world realize that they had had a secret atomic project? - atomic project doesnot mean "atomic bomb" project.- .
There is nothing secret about Iran's atomic project, the project started in 1970s under Shah and it was U.S.A that sold the technology and was insisting that Iran should have nuclear power plants.
Then what was the circumestance that forced mullahs to suspend their atomic activities for 3 years? Or you haven't heard that too. .
The Iran Atomic program was on and off for many different reasons. Change of regime in Iran stopped it for many years, war with Iraq stopped it for many years and now they have started to work on it again. The simple fact remains that there is no proof that Iran is developing atomic weapons with exception of claims by Islamic terrorist group that was working for Saddam previously.