It was HIGHLY un-PC. So un-PC I actually edited my post to avoid arguments and flaming lol Thats a pretty silly statement. I'm pretty sure we can buy bullets in bulk for pennies on the dollar How did you see someone get killed? Thats crazy. I have had a few guns put in my face, but actually seeing someone get killed, thats crazy. Clearly you are not from the U.S. Some of these animals get off with just probation.
Now today technology has greatly advance and will continue to do so to eliminate out innocent people. Then how can you claim there is no such thing as "beyond doubt", as if you are certain of your opinion? I am quite sure many doubt what you are saying.
Of course many do. I am not "beyond doubt" and I don't belive anyone is about anything. No matter how good technology gets I still dont think there is any way to have 100% sure that the guilty is really guilty.
heh I guess it's for the better then Managing a convenience store in ATL. Dude gets out of the passenger side of his girlfriend's car and randomly shoots two people.
If they killed everyone who commited a sexual harresment towards kids, there would be a huge blood shed lol. I've seen a TV programme on the news which takes place in the U.S. and dedicated to catch those freaks. Also if they made a deep search about kids who lived with a step-dad(or mom), it'd show it's not exceptional at all.
The repeat offense rate is about 13% with no "treatment" and about 7% with "treatment". But 100% of executed pedophiles never again rape another child.
Rebecca I just want to correct a small important detail you did not add.. You should have wrote "repeat offense arrest rate". Many pedophiles repeatedly molest children but do not get caught by police. Also I have read that the statistics are higher, I'll have to find that link.
Oh don't bother I believe you, that is just common sense. I was thinking as I posted that, statistics would only show the ones actually being caught. I'm sure the number is much higher...
I think we don't need legal execution at all, it simply is not legal, no matter what lawmakers saing about it. All this is downgrading ourselves to the same level of the culprits, not to mention the costs. If these people are senteneced to life in prison without parole they will get a job to pay for their crime and only receiving a fraction of the value for what they are working and the major part of that earnings goes to the relatives of victimes, cover the cost of (prison) housing etc.. So what do you think is a better solution?
You definately have a point and what your saying makes a lot of sense, however if something like that happened to my niece I would much rather kill the pedophile.
I do understand the emotional part of it, but we have to remember that emotions are dissapearing over the time but the criminal act(person) is still under punishment.
I see nothing wrong with the elimination of bad genes and specimins from society when it comes to the criminal element. The less there are the better - consider it a kind of survival of the fittest. Those unfit for society, the criminals: Rapists, Pedophiles, Serial Killers, simply should be eliminated to save use resources, time, and money. Economically it is beneficial, genetically it is beneficial, overall, it is better to eliminate them quickly.
Exactly! That is what I have been trying to say this whole time. If you killed all the serial killers then we would no longer have a government.
Wow, what a lovely utopic vision that would be. Surely the fact that you have gone around murdering all these people, would kind of make you a serial killer.