What site did you submit and what category did you submit it too? If you are just here to complain, then your thread contributes NOTHING to Digital point. If you actually want to know an answer, then help us help you! I agree, the threads like that are annoying...though from the looks of many of them it's obvious why they were not accepted. I mean, if they are unwilling to share the URL of the site and just want to complain, I'd wager the quality of the site is not worthy of linking too in a thread about it even.
A lot can happen in 18 months . When is the last time you submitted? What site did you submit? ????????
That's because many editors look for sites outside of the suggestion pool to find content rich quality sites to add to the directory. In fact it can often take less time looking for quality sites on your own rather than sifting through the mud of unreviewed sites.
I'm not looking up your cat to see if it has an editor or not...as if there is no editor, then there is nothing that'll really help (cept maybe an editor ) Though, http://www.naxos-rooms.com/Rentals.html] is blank. If I were to check it and that was the first link I clicked on (which it was) then I'd have hit the back button twice and rejected it. other then that, I don't have room to judge, as heh, I didn't bother reading anything else (other then to see if other pages were blank). I'm not saying that filling in that page will lead to inclusion, just saying that may be a factor.
Hey, that looks like it could be a really sharp site, why aren't you working to fill it up. It's very attractive at first glance. sorry ot
Thanks for the replys guys.I will fill all the missing parts.but you know that i have to launch my new site before the summer period get start because i am very busy at this period.When i submited it was a very simple site with no missing parts.I dont think this is the reason. Thanks for the replys.
<rant> What ever was the point of suggesting two darned near identical websites on different domain names to the same category in defiance of the submission guidelines which prohibit the suggestion of related websites? Did you think that nobody would notice the adjacent almost identical KW stuffed descriptions? Did you think that the guidelines could be safely ignored? Sheesh, yet another example of the net based travel and tourism industry justifying its well earned reputation. And people wonder why editors prefer other sectors. </rant>
it take one day to answer me for an editor place and 1 year not to have my site incuded.dont care anymore.The rentals is not on my site? look all the others sites of naxos island that is incuded and see mine and then we can talk!!!!!
It's not a matter of other sites, it's not a matter of your other pages. You are lacking content, end of story. if an editor checked your site, and randomly clicked a link and got a blank page, then that would be grounds for 'under construction' or 'lack of content' or any other number of things that make editors not include sites based on blank pages. If that page has been blank for a year now, then how many of your pages had nothing when you submitted?
Its not a dead link its a page with no one to be advirtised yet!!!! someone above of you told me for duplicate for something that is not even listed!!! ok dont matter just i will stop and avoid to get list there! Thanks all for the replys.