As the whole thing was just a complete sham designed to frighten the sheeple this comes as absolutely no surprise whatsoever. http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/05/alleged-liquid-bombers-plead-not-guilty.html Wakey wakey sheeeeeple.
Have you sent care packages to you buds? If they say they are not guilty, then they probably are not Look, a blog, with the word "patriot" in it, not unlikes "truthers" use the word "truth" to disguise their intentions!
They pleaded not guilty? well then there you go they are innocent! this whole thread is just a complete sham designed to make people love AGS's admired one's (terrorists) & comes as absolutely no surprise whatsoever.
Almost all of your replies to posts these days have zero relevance to the actual topic and are usually posted in desperation within 5 minutes of the previous reply. Actually 6 minutes in this case, you're slacking! Dude, do you ever sleep???? You really need a week or two's rest, as I said before I'll get the rest of the crazy gang to cover for you, TWO PACKS seems keen, and even though I cannot see his posts I'm sure he/she would be honoured to fill your boots whilst you are away.
Making terrorists innocent is an hard job and full time one for you, i suggest you take the day off instead. The time off will give you a rest from prisonplanet too & you might be able to take lower dosages of your meds!
Gee, a Ron Paul supporter giving aid and comfort to terrorists again. *This* makes me want to rush out and start voting for Ron Paul because surely he has similar values or AGS wouldn't be pushing him.
If you don't believe what a blog says because the name of the blog includes "patriot" or "truth", then what would you believe? "Treasonous Liars dot blogspot dot com"?? Having revealed your prejudice is one thing, but it has no bearing on the reliability of the blog or its author.
I never said or even implied that they were innocent ... they could well have been plotting to do something very nasty. But they could never have pulled it off, as the article makes clear, if you would read it. the whole thread is not a shame at all ... but the liquid bomber plot was!
Am I the only one here that see's AGS in my minds eye as the young, naive and gullible Anakin Skywalker? "Yes, yes young AGS, come to the Dar...err..I mean liberal side. It is your dessssstinyyyyy"
Huh, right. Firstly WinterPatriot that's your site & your not the member AGS who posted this correct? Well my response was directed to him, although your story may not be trying to make terrorists "innocent", AGS posts things like this for that reason.
Thanks very much for posting this. As the tail of the linked article says, it's the 16th in a series. I'm too new here to post links but maybe somebody else would like to do so ... The 16-part series whole documents the entire "liquid bombers" story, from the arrest of the alleged mastermind in Pakistan in August, through the two huge libel settlements paid by the British media for getting tiny little details wrong. Did you know about those? They paid hundreds of thousands for small errors, and in the meantime all the big lies remain standing! How about that? As my Canadian friends would say, we're taking a hosing, friends. And by the way I have no affinity with the terrorists, if that's what they were. I've just been following the case and reporting the details. The 16 articles in the series so far include hundreds of links to news accounts and analysis of the case and related documents; read THEM if you don't believe ME! In fact, DON'T BELIEVE ME! Read and think and make up your own mind. Actually here's a good way to approach it ... There were two kinds of explosives mentioned in the news reports. I discussed the first in a piece called "To Mix The Impossible Bomb" and the second in a piece called "NYT Blocks British Readers from Monday's Article on Alleged Liquid Bombing Plot". The second article also contains a link to the NYT piece that the Brits were not allowed to read. The NYT published the regular paper but didn't ship any papers to England that day, remember? That was strange... In any case, both explosives are made with more or less the same chemistry, so the process is roughly the same. And no matter which kind of explosive they end up charging these guys with plotting to use, there's simply no chance that the trial is ever gonna survive the testimony of a competent chemist! Not one chance in a million! But they don't care because they've already trampled your rights and by the time the trial falls apart (in secret, no doubt) all the ridiculous restrictions about how much orange juice -- or toothpaste! -- you can take on a plane ... all that will be old news. This story is really about the misuse of the terror threat in order to enable the creeping advance of a military/police state ... and it hardly matters whether the plotters were plotting or not, nor whether they are found guilty, nor whether the trial even happens. They've dominated their news cycles and now they're gone ... except for those who choose to read and learn and remember. So ... if you really, really, really, want to know what's going on, google "Winter Patriot" and "The Liquid Bombers Series" for the title page of the series and go from there. On the other hand, if you really, really, really, want to judge the credibility of my blog by its name, then go ahead.
yes that's my site. AGS posted this. I cannot comment on your reply to AGS ... nor would I presume to do so. I'll be happy to talk about whether or not these guys are "innocent" but I can't say anything about AGS. Fair enough?
You should probably rush this over to their defense trial attorneys. Reasons why a terrorist is innocent...check Mention of the obligatory police state...check Doesn't matter if they were plotting...check All present and accounted for!
Oh good ****ing gods... Secondly, AGS, Cowardice is in ignoring, ignoring is purposeful ignorance, purposeful ignorance is.... what you claim the "sheeple" do. Doesn't this mean that ignoring Toopac makes you a "sheeple"? If not, explain how it does not. Intellectual honesty comes from diligent reading of every post whether or not you like the poster - and it includes the exclusion of knowing and purposeful ignorance. See the steeple under the people as they burn in hell with the sheeple.