Michigan GOP Move To Kick Ron Paul Out Of Debates Dropped

http://www.shoutwire.com/viewstory/68894/Michigan_GOP_Move_to_Kick_Ron_Paul_Out_of_Debates_Dropped

 

I actually think he might have a chance.. It might be a long shot, but theres a possibility.. I've never seen so many people advertise ron paul so much, in the course of 2 days, I see alot of things......... might it be a video, thread or news on ron paul.

 

That's because alex jones has instructed his sheeple to go forth and promote him. These are the same type of people whose goal in life is nothing more than blaming their country first for everything.

Howard Dean suffered a similar fate, though he wasn't (at least publicly) delving into conspiracy theories.

 

I didn't realize blowback was a conspiracy theory.

 

That's because I never mentioned anything about blowback. Next attempt at dishonesty?

 

Blowback is what sparked all this controversy, what else would you be referring to?

PS: I don't post here that often, so if I respond to a post and my response is completely off base it's because you haven't fully explained what you're talking about.

 

Never mentioned Blowback? Then what does this refer to?

 

This type of disingenuity, which they then project onto you goes on a lot, because they cannot deal in facts.

 

I've not mentioned anything about blowback. What I did mention though, is backed up here:

http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&q="alex+jones"+"ron+paul"&btnG=Google+Search

Keep it honest

 

The facts are in my last post. AJ has instructed his conspiracy sheeple to go forth and promote him. You are proof of that.

You, of all people here, briant, should be ashamed of even bringing up "disingenuity"

 

Excuse me? Google search results are not a source. Go find an article that explicitly proves Ron Paul supports conspiracy theories (I mean actual conspiracy theories, NOT BLOWBACK) and I'll take you serious.

 

Speaking of which, "These are the same type of people whose goal in life is nothing more than blaming their country first for everything." This is appearantly not a referral to "blowback."

 

If you look around the net at political discussions, you will often see this: diversions from the real issues with an insistence that you defend yourself or those who represent change, from any charge they can contrive.

Here is an example of how the "pros" do it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_r8...lanet.com/articles/may2007/170507smearjob.htm

 

I don't really have a problem with him attacking Ron Paul, it's his right to do so. I'd just like to see the reasoning behind it. As far as I can tell he dislikes him because conspiracy websites support him, which is a weak excuse IMO. It's like refusing to watch hockey because someone you hate watches it too.

 

I think that Briant and checksum will pwn GTechs ass in this thread.

The reason I say that is GT's only defence is to keep saying that Jones has instructed the sheeple (which in itself is odd as the FOX loving hawks are the true definition of sheeple.)

The reason Paul is getting so many idiots trying to scupper his chances is because he's not a controlled muppet like the other 9 in the Republican debate.

 

Looks like GTech went to download the new talking points, since the current talking points are a Miserable Failure

 

AJ has instructed his conspiracy sheeple to go forth and promote him. I provided roughly over 100,000 results that seem to confirm this. I stand by that point, I stand by the results. Regardless of how you try to misphrase what I said, I will continue to keep you honest, whether you want it or not.

My point, again: AJ has instructed his conspiracy sheeple to go forth and promote him.

If you can't disprove that, you have a problem.

 

You also believe that there is an illuminati and that 9/11 was an inside job. You also let alex jones do your thinking. It's no wonder you would offer such. Should I be surprised?

 

It seems that you have your very own one-man Illuminati who is behind it all--Alex Jones

 

He has a way with suckering in the young and gullible, doesn't he...briant?