Troops kill Taliban Leader Mullah Dadullah

Arabic-language television network Al-Jazeera reported Sunday that Taliban sources confirmed Dadullah died in battle in Helmand Province.
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/05/13/afghan.dadullah/index.html

Brutal Taliban leader slain in Helmand Province battle

If it is confirmed that Dadullah is dead, then that is one of the most "significant blows" and "perhaps the biggest military loss" the Taliban has had since the 2001 U.S.-led invasion.

Clips have just been shown on TV around the world of his dead body

Comments :-

 

source www.spiegel.de
Looks like one less.
Needs some Gene testing to confirm though

 

Thanks Arnie that's him he has no more need for his artificial leg now

 

In the press, we always hear that the western troops have killed taliban leaders but the war or terrorism never seem to end. What's the right solution?

 

War on terror or (war on islam) is never going to end. Muslim population is over a billion now.

 

There are a lot of them. Have a bit of patience, will 'ya?

This war is likely to continue for at least the next 50 years.

Well, if the Muslims would grow some cojones and declare war on the Islamists, the entire war could be over a lot sooner.

 

Hey, I would like to offer my condolences to Gworld, Briant, AGS, and all the other supporters of the Taliban that post inside the DP forums...not.

 

Typical nonsense from you eh mate?

As I've said before, just because some of us do not support dangerous terrorists like Bush and Cheney doesn't make us Taliban supporters, you been watching too much FOX News I think.

 

One day , all peoples in the world will have their countries given back to them!

 

you are right...because you do not support Bush and Cheney does not make a terrorist lover....its all the posts where you never say a bad word about the terrorists that make you a terrorist lover. You have had plenty of those, including the one I quoted in this post.

 

Have you even thought about what the definition of terrorist is d16man?

Forget all this "never a bad word" nonsense that GT says in all posts when someone is not supporting the very dangerous Bush.

As I have said before, you are letting FOX News' O'Reilly and controlled media whores like Hannity and Colmes do your thinking for you mate. I see it every day here and it just makes you sound completely brainwashed and extremely repetitive.

 

One less shit bag in the world.

I'm sure AGS, Briant etc will be posting in this thread soon saying similar things to what i said above.

 

You are WRONG. You are assuming that d16boy has a brain, which is nothing but totally unfounded rumor that is proved false time after time.

 

A) Colmes is a liberal...you ought to know this.
B) a terrorist in your opinion is the republican who is in office, not the idiots who caused thousands of innocents to die by flying airplanes into the WTC.
C) you only believe what Alex Jones tells you, so what does it matter anyway?

I guess in your mind Bush is dangerous because he has the balls to actually go after these guys, without feeling bad about it. You however would prefer he didn't do this (your word "illegal")....what law was broken again??

 

This guys isn't related to the "number 2" Al Qaeda leader is he? Because that guy has more lives than a herd of cats

 

Colmes is whoever the people controlling him want him to be.

The only reason they have the Hannity and Colmes show is to con the sheeple into thinking that they are unbiased, in all fairness FOX News supports whoever Rupert Murdoch tells them to.

For example, here's a little snippet of info from your uncle AGS, Rupert Murdoch owns THE SUN newspaper in the UK (amongst others.) Back in the 1990's the sun was a FULL ON Conservative supporting newspaper, it lived and breathed Conservative.

Then, in the mid 90's when it became pretty clear to everyone that the Conservative Party were rapidly going down the shitter the paper completely switch it's allegiance to the Labour Party.

You can never trust the mainstream media mate. But they still seem to keep sheeple like you in check.

 

Colmes is a straw man.

http://philosophersplayground.blogspot.com/2006/03/falcon-and-strawman_24.html

 

Colmes is liberal. His points of view are consistently liberal; simply stating otherwise does not coincide with what is factual. And from what I have seen, many guest speakers on many of the Fox programs are not conservative, but in fact come from quite liberal groups or media orginazations. Are all of these people "straw men" too?

 

I've never mentioned straw men so I cannot answer that one mate.

 

You know what I mean, you have many references for these people who you claim blindly follow without question. Maybe it's just that you have never taken the time to actually watch a Fox program, and simply take what others say about the orginazation at face value? Who's the sheeple now?