^^^ See how that's done? It makes it a lot less confusing for other readers as to who said what. See http://www.google.com/search?source...s=GGLJ,GGLJ:2006-29,GGLJ:en&q=unix+sues+linux
What has Anthony got to do with this thread? As far as I know, he hasn't even posted here. In fact, as far as I know, he hasn't posted anywhere at DP recently - isn't he banned? So was there a point at all in bringing up his name? Or was this just random brain cells firing again? I'm truly sorry if that was hard for you to figure out. Let me dumb it down a notch for you... http://www.google.com/search?source...s=GGLJ,GGLJ:2006-29,GGLJ:en&q=unix+sues+linux ...more My abject apologies. I'll try to remember in future that actually makiing an effort is difficult for you, and I'll dumb it down as much as I possibly can. Obviously, the watchword for you and your pathetic cronies is "spoon-feeding".
Yeah, anthony didn't use to do that... what he would do is post random searches that were unrelated to the argument at hand, and call them "proof" of what he was saying. He always left out the part of it requiring a massive LSD history in order to see what he saw when doing those searches. Posting URL's with obvious on topic results is totally different. -Michael