Ron Paul has landslide victory at GOP Debates: He is ignored by the corp media.

Thomas Jefferson -- who sent the Navy and the Marines to deal with the Arab terrorists who were attacking American interests -- would kick Ron Paul in the ass.

And all of the founding fathers would gang up on his anti-immigration stance.

Moreover, those guys grew America from the original 13 colonies, so they would most likely be in support of the very NAU concept which most terrifies Mr. Paul.

 

Are you trying to take alex jone's credit away, again? He's the one that told you to think this, shouldn't you be giving him credit instead of pretending somehow "you" just happened to be the "selected" one the group of lizards happened to give the knowledge to?

Don't be so self-centered, AGS. Always trying to take someone's credit away, good OR bad.

 

Please stop bumbling GTech. The pressure of defending the miserable failure Bush is begginning to take it's toll on you.

The NAU is already being planned, the NAFTA Super Highway is being planned too. Stop pretending that these things are not happening when they are already going through. The only reason the sheeple do not know about it is because the controlled MSM are not exactly shouting about it.

Control the media, control the sheeple.

 

AGS:

In this country, laws are public. They get published.

If you could read, you could read them.

 

the whole "nafta superhighway" is a myth started by a big red line on a map; which clearly follows existing roads. but the nau-believers did not actually research anything, just saw a big red line linking brown people with white people and thought "this is evil!"

 

http://www.pccua.edu/keough/Thomas Jefferson and the Barbary Pirates.htm

We should definitely listen to Jefferson on this one

Where's Lloyd Benson when you need him?

 

You appear to have completely misunderstood that paragraph, and indeed, Jefferson's entire presidency.

Worse, this is explained in the article you cut and pasted from, albeit in a complete misleading and propagandized fashion.

Here's a version that is written in a much more straightforward and much less propagandized manner:

His problem was his own party and the clause in the Constitution that gave Congress the power to declare war. With not atypical subtlety, Jefferson took a shortcut through this thicket in 1801 and sent the navy to North Africa on patrol, as it were, with instructions to enforce existing treaties and punish infractions of them. Our third president did not inform Congress of his authorization of this mission until the fleet was too far away to recall.​

Next time, read for comprehension instead of reading for keywords.

 

Yes, and read the whole thing. I added the link that I thought I had added before

 

This isn't about Bush or your terrorist buds. A diversionary tactic to avoid answering the question. As such, I'll ask again:

Are you trying to take alex jone's credit away, again? He's the one that told you to think this, shouldn't you be giving him credit instead of pretending somehow "you" just happened to be the "selected" one the group of lizards happened to give the knowledge to?

Answer the question. Or are you ashamed?

Is this the same media Bush is controlling that ceaselessly tears him from limb to limb every day? The same media that you get your own view of the Iraq war from?

It seems like you project your own shortcomings, ie: letting alex jones think for you, onto others, as a defense mechanism.

 

The question is moot because are spinning lizard BS into it GTech.

Every day you keep trying to defend the miserable failure Bush, I feel sorry for you but please cut the spin out.

Be honest GTech and stop associating me with this lizard BS to try and make yourself look smart.

Bush has ruined the world, we should all be angry at that.

 

So you are not willing to admit alex jones has told you to think on this subject? You are just going to take the credit yourself, that "some group of people" chose you, out of everyone else on the world, to expose it to? That's awfully selfish of you, to steal someone else's credit for yourself.

This, as do most posts, has nothing to do with Bush, nor does it have to do with the terrorist groups you support and defend. It's up to you to search your inner soul as to why you defend and make excuses for terrorists. But that's another subject.

Another diversionary tactic to avoid answering another obvious question. As such, I'll ignore your dishonesty and again and repeat the question:

Is this the same media Bush is controlling that ceaselessly tears him from limb to limb every day? The same media that you get your own view of the Iraq war from?

You don't like to answer questions that counter your cognitive dissonance, do you?

 

Dude, nobody tells me how to think, I get my information from everywhere and form my own opinions on that, nobody thinks for me.

Unlike you and your neocon supporting friends over at FOX News.

What are you talking about???
Most of the mainstream media I see coming from the USA on my sky box is actually defending the MISERABLE FAILURE.

 

ruined the world? How? I see it that he has brought the economy back to a place that not even Clinton was able to do. He has rid the world on saddam hussain and many hundreds of terrorists. He has lowered taxes for many individuals and small businesses.

Yet, I guess to you he has ruined the world because now your terrorist buds don't have as much control as you would like to give them.

 

That's BS i may be on Virgin media but i think we get the same news

 

He is responsible for the deaths of around 600,000 innocent people, plus over 3,300 American troops all on the basis of the MASSIVE WMD LIE mate.

I'm actually amazed at the extent you will go to to defend him.

 

On what you believe was a lie

 

I'm amazed at the extend you go to defend terrorists. But, I've come to accept, that is what you do.

I'm also amazed that you would lie about WMD, considering *some* wmd were found, and even more amazed that you would lie about ficticious numbers that have been debunked. I'm equally amazed that you give the terrorists credit in Iraq, away to Bush and the US. Never a bad word for those that use children in suicide bombs.

It sort of makes a statement about what you support and what you don't. Wouldn't you agree?

 

Please stop clinging to the lie.

 

I made you an offer a few days ago, one hundred dollars to prove the wmd that have been found, were not actually found. You ran away from it, like everything else that requires reason.

Perhaps the problem isn't everyone else. Perhaps it's you?

 

The problem is that it is widely accepted worldwide by pretty much everyone that there were no WMDs.

Except in a small corner of the world in this P&R forum by you and your chums.