Ron Paul has landslide victory at GOP Debates: He is ignored by the corp media.

One more thing, and this is for lorien. You said that the online polls are not scientific, and lets say that you're right. Even if that is true, because Ron Paul did win the online polls, shouldn't he at least be featured under Yahoo Coverage with the other political candidates? Why didn't they add him if he won the online polls? Why did ABC ignore him?

 

Tesla, you are smarter than this. You know that the poll was Dugg by a truther and the Diggbatts skewed the poll. Online polls are, by far, the most unreliable polls out there. this poll allows multiple votes from the same person which makes it easy to manipulate. You know this as well as I. Seriously, why are you trying to fool yourself here?

Here's a poll by a respected polling place. I don't think Paul even places.

http://www.rasmussenresearch.com/Po...blican Primary/2008GOPPresidentialPrimary.htm

If he polls less than 1% in an actual poll that is taken of actual republican voters; why does he merit coverage? By your logic (win an online poll, win media coverage), I'm going to nominate myself, skew the poll towards me and get oodles of press. Good for business!

 

We agree on that.

As for 9-11. I would just say that I feel well informed.

RememberThe11th.com

 

LMAO

Rasmussen Reports - <<the best place to look for polls that are spot on>>

RMFAO that is even worse than FOX News - News you can trust.

It has to be rigged, look how high they have Americas fake mayor above everyone else.

You sheeeeeple are already being groomed for the run in, the sham, the complete fix.

 

There is something that doesn't make sense about this link:http://www.rasmussenresearch.com/Pol...ialPrimary.htm

How can the poll numbers be so different from MSNBC and CSPAN? By the way, you can only vote once at those websites, not twice. They track your IP address. The theory that truthers flooded the online polls doesn't make much sense.

 

I just voted twice for Paul. No "you already voted message" no instant results when I reloaded the page. Nothing. Clearly you can vote as many times as you want.

Begging the question AGS. Any evidence of rigging? Besides you not liking the outcome? Think I want Guiliani ahead? I don't, but those are the standard numbers every time a poll comes out.

 

I think we can safely say it will be Giuliani v Clinton mate, a complete sham.

The MSM do whatever they are told to do, Paul has been censored and the average American that doesn't do any research will barely even know about Paul and how he can save America from the disaster that it's corrupt leaders have taken it into.

So we'll have a full on BS "all singing, all dancing" bells and whistles BS contest between 2 corrupt and controlled candidates.

FOX News will lap it up and the sheeple will be hooked again, another 8 years of either a Bush or Clinton running your country sice 1981, taking you to 2016!
That is nearly 40 years of a Bush or a Clinton. And you wonder why we are in the disaster we are in now???

 

So you don't have any complaint, other than you dislike the front runners. Gotcha. And here, I thought, that you had actual evidence of a corrupt poll. I should know better, shouldnt I

 

Every other poll had Paul out in front by a mile like the OP pointed out.

The only reason Americas fake mayor is a front runner is because the controlled MSM have been instructed to make him a front runner.

 

Again. What reputable poll? Not an online poll. A real poll. Of republican voters. Gimme one.

Paranoid much? I'm sure name recognition has nothing to do with it.

 

Giuliani has no leadership qualitys whatsoever but you're right, most people will remember him from 9/11.

 

But Guiliani goes to watch the ball game he's known there too

 

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q="alex+jones"+"ron+paul"&btnG=Search

There's no question the "conspiracy" crowd here is soley influenced by alex jones on this guy. He's all over aj's sites that pimp fear into the gullible. Talk about dejasheeple!

 

GTech is correct, it's only because Alex Jones has okayed this guy that all the nutters are jumping on the bandwagon. AGS & the other anti-reality people wouldn't support him if Alex Jones was against Ron Paul & claimed Ron was a lizard, would they?

 

• CNN/Opinion Research shows Giuliani in 1st place with 25% of the vote.
• USA Today/Gallup shows Giuliani in 1st place with 34% of the vote.
• Rasmussen shows Giuliani in 1st place with 25% of the vote.
• Marist shows Giuliani in 1st place with 28% of the vote.
• Quinnipiac shows Giuliani in 1st place with 27% of the vote.
• Cook/RT Strategies shows Giuliani in 1st place with 28% of the vote.

None of these pollsters show Ron Paul in the top five.

The top five are:

1. Giuliani
2. McCain
3. Thompson
4. Romney
5. Gingrich

Outbound polls show Giuliani in the lead. Inbound polls show Ron Paul in the lead? Why? Because Ron Paul's supporters are rabid.

If Ron Paul's foreign policy wasn't so kooky, I would probably be a Ron Paul supporter. He agrees with me on a large number of domestic issues.

I really don't see Ron Paul as a "truther", but he suffers from extreme myopia when looking at the long-term health and safety of our nation.

 

I don't think he's an out and out truther; but at best he's an enabler. At worst he's a believer. He has also come out and said he believes the NAU conspiracy as well. So, he's clearly going after the conspiracy nuts here. Or he is one; more likely the latter.

 

That's already going through lorien.

In the near future when you have got a million Mexicans in your back garden and using your Amero currency you will hopefully remember this post of mine.

Add it to your favourates mate.

 

As I said; he attracts the loons.

 

That's another thing I can't stand, <expletive deleted> racists.

 

Its very simple, if this Ron Paul isnt going to be playing ball with the power structure( big business, oil companies etc) then he wont win. This is how things are structured today. Imagine how our founding fathers would feel about this if they were alive today? What would their response be?