Ron Paul has landslide victory at GOP Debates: He is ignored by the corp media.

Despite the fact that Ron Paul slaughtered the other Republican candidates at the debate, he is completely ignored by the mainstream media. They didn't even list his profile with the Republican Candidates at Yahoo!

This is clear evidence that as I've said in previous threads "Americans do not control who gets in the White House." Despite the fact that most people picked Ron Paul, he is complete ignored. If he was given the coverage of Hillary or McCain, he would be elected president in a heart beat.

Take a real good look at this video of Ron Paul on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peBGJwE9NXo

Ron Paul wants real freedom and the establishment doesn't want him in the white house. Period. Below is a well written article by Paul Joseph Watson:


Texas Congressman trounces rivals in all polls but is deliberately pushed to margins by terrified corporate media

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, May 9, 2007


Ron Paul emerged from last week's GOP debate as completely victorious according to every available benchmark and yet there is still a deliberate ploy to push the Texas Congressman to the sidelines on behalf of a terrified corporate media.

Every single major online poll shows conclusively that Ron Paul won the debate by a mammoth margin, trouncing the bought and paid-for shill Neo-Con candidates that the establishment press are sworn to uphold.

After just over 18,000 votes, the ABC News poll shows Ron Paul with 15,568 compared with nearest rival Mitt Romney who is on a paltry 245. After initially scrubbing Paul from the poll altogether, ABC were forced to add his name after a deluge of furious calls and e mails.

Ron Paul led MSNBC's poll right from the start and before it had even been widely circulated. ABC News claims that activist voting and multiple voting by individuals artificially inflated Paul's numbers, but both claims are demonstrably false. Keith Olbermann reported that Paul was ahead before the link was spread around message boards and blogs and to vote multiple times is impossible - the poll only allows one vote per IP address.



At time of press, Paul currently has 40% approval and 25% disapproval, compared with 43% disapproval and only 22% approval for Giuliani.

Capital News, an arm of CSPAN, had Paul leading his nearest rival Mitt Romney by 60% shortly before voting closed. Rudy Giuliani garnered just 6% of the vote.

Yahoo! News is still censoring Ron Paul by not including him in the list of candidates on their 2008 presidential coverage page, despite the fact that he is wildly popular and has trounced every other Republican candidate in ever online poll.

After receiving a flood of angry complaints, Yahoo promised to review the situation, but 24 hours later their page is still absent any mention of Ron Paul.

This whole fiasco underscores the reality that the President of the United States is not elected by the popular will of the people, but instead is selected from a highly restricted gaggle of pre-approved establishment lackeys.



The corporate media offer the excuse that Ron Paul is not a mainstream candidate and has little chance of winning, therefore their decision to afford him little coverage is justified. But this is a chicken and egg scenario - if the media routinely ignore so-called marginal candidates then they are never going to attain the exposure of a Giuliani or a Romney, thus the media bias becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

If Ron Paul was afforded equal media coverage at every step of the way before the Republican nomination, and if America was still a free country with a democratic process that actually worked, then Ron Paul would be a shoe-in for the Oval Office.

But the fact remains, as is painfully underscored by the media's treatment of Ron Paul, that America is a banana republic where the president is not elected by popular will but selected by the corporate and military-industrial kingpins that for whom, upon inauguration, he becomes the puppet.

 

And space aliens and the illuminati.

 

Why keep referring to the same crap ass copy and paste line lorien?

Why not think about the fact that your country has been controlled by 2 corrupt families since 1981?

The reason Paul has absolutely no chance is because he is an honest man with the interests of the American people at heart.

That is why the controlled mainstream media are ignoring him. It's not rocket science lorien.

 

Ru Paul? Ru Paul is running for President?

 

One thing that we know for certain is that based on the polls, The American people choose Ron Paul over the other Republican candidates. Will Spencer and lorien can come in the thread making fun of Ron Paul all they want, but the poll numbers speak for themselves.

No one can debate me on the fact that Yahoo completely ignores Ron Paul, while listing all the other candidates. It is rock solid evidence that our media is bought and paid for.

But I tell you this much. You guys might want to get on our side and vote for Ron Paul if you actually care about the future of your country. If you think getting rid of the Income tax is a bad idea, or net neutrality is a bad idea, you're dead wrong. None of the other Republic candidates are talking about this stuff, and they won't give more power back to the states.

 

I thought that was because the illuminati lizard people have predestined Hillary's victory. Isn't that what you keep telling us, AGS? So why would the media, as part of the plot cover him. Hillary is a shoe in? You know this. I know this. Why are you bickering about it?

 

Which poll?

 

MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18436681

CSPAN
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=103899


He is winning in every poll. By a landslide. The other candidates don't have a chance. Now, the big question. Why isn't he listed under the Yahoo Candidate coverage? http://news.yahoo.com/page/presidential_election_2008;_ylt=Ak1s8jjCRsM1WXtXEAygkotpu6cv

The Answer: Because they don't want him to win. He isn't bought and paid for by corporate interests like the other candidates. Why else would Yahoo block him? Ron Paul wants to help the American people, and "they" don't want to get a man in office who will do that. Oh no.

 

Online polls? Those are scientific Show me a poll from a reputable polling place that has Paul above, say 2%, and we'll talk.

 

Are "we" pretending again, that the only reason conspiracy nuts are interested in Ron Paul is not because of his 9/11 conspiracy theory beliefs? In fact, this is the *only* reason any of the "truthers" (an opposite meaning, like in ebonics, when someone says "yeah, that was bad, man!") are interested in him. alex jones was pimping him a while back, so it seems natural that those who let alex jones do their thinking for them (cough...ags...cough...tesla...cough...briant...double cough...akula) would back him. After all, alex said so!

Are you referring to the poll that "truthers" planned ahead of time to rush over and vote as one huge group to give their candidate's appeal a misleading representation?

Remember, ordinary people are not as IQ challenged as alex jones followers. It takes a little more effort to "pull the wool over our eyes!"

 

Didn't online polls suggest Howard "the duck" Dean was a favorite too? His hopes were let down in a shattering way.

Lesson learned from HD's experience? After a debate, going over enmasse as a collective group to show support by voting in a poll only serves short term delusion. In the long run, reality wins.

 

I think actual polls showed Dean ahead though; then he fizzled out, then he want insane. At least ron paul starts at insane and can progress from there

 

Show me a poll which indicates he is losing. Scientific or not, he beats the other candidate by such a large margin that there is little room for error.

You think that the thousands of people who voted for Ron Paul are truthers? I don't think so, but if they did, man, it looks like we may take the election in 2008! Now, if we can only beat out Hillary and Barack............

 

As I have said before 2 absolutely corrupt familys have run your country since 1981.

You do the math.

Having said that someone has to run against Clinton just so that it looks like a contest, and as I have said many times before it has got to be Americas fake mayor Giuliani. I think Insane McCain is well out of it, being the deranged lunatic that he is.

 

It is this type of attitude that gets you and your candidate nowhere.

Agree with me or you are un-American and should move. Well, that attitude is un-American.

I actually agree with some of his politics, but you are so rude about it, I really could not care less that he gets screwed by the news.

 

You also have said 9/11 was an inside job and spent marginal (at best) effort to absolve terrorists of their crimes through the same type of conspiracy theory Ron Paul has subscribed to.

Are you really so shallow to beleive others cannot see the connection? Is there any "conspiracy nut" that gives aid and comfort to terrorists here, who is NOT behind Ron Paul, because he also promotes a 9/11 conspiracy idea?

What's that phrase you use often...let's see...ah, yes! "wakey wakey, sheeple!"

 

If you're so shortsighted as to be sidelined by my posts, it is your problem. Not mine. This is bigger than you, or me. I may have went overboard, but it is the truth. America is dying, and Ron Paul is the only person with Constitutional values. Who else are you going to vote for?

The Democratic candidates want socialism, and the other republican candidates want corporatism. It sounds to me like you don't have much a choice if you want freedom.........and a country run by Constitutional principles.

 

You're long past waking up mate.

It will be Americas fake mayor v The dirty corrupt dog Hillary.

I am even cringing thinking about them televised "debates" just like we had with Bush v Kerry where both of them bumbled their way through with that fat dude sat there as a moderator LMFAO.

The script has probably been written already.

 

I would not vote for him because of his crackpot theories. They indicate to me that he is not fit to be President.

That being said, I do agree with some of his more Libertarian ideas.

 

I actually think that Ron Paul has a chance. He has the deck of cards stacked against him, mainly because the mainstream media wants to ignore him. But we have something today that we haven't had in the past, and that is the Internet.

Just like the online community demanded that ABC run footage on Paul, I think that 2008 could be a historical year.

Have you actually looked at any of his "crackpot" theories? Who told you they were crackpot ideas? The corporate owned media? If you believe 911 being an inside job is a crackpot theory, you may want to watch the movies TerrorStorm, Martial Law 911, or Loose Change. Also, watch "official" movies which support the official story of 911. Compare the two side by side. You will find out the truth for yourself.

Hey, Bruce Willis was on the dark side, but he now joined us. Maybe I was a bit harsh in saying you are UnAmerican if you don't agree with Paul, but the other candidates are completely corrupt. Giuliani has mafia ties, and he wants to get rid of guns. Mitt Romney is not a true conservative.


I even took the liberty of deleting the paragraph where I called people Unamerican for not believing in Ron Paul's policies. I do apologize for that, because people should have the right to vote for whoever they want.

But the candidates should also be given fair coverage.