Does the Google takes only static site not dynamic

Does the Google takes only static site not dynamic

 

Google indexes dynamic sites just fine, if that's what you are asking.

http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=34431

 

but if you site only have a few pages,you'd better use static pages ,as you can easily edit it for seo .

 

What? That is completely untrue. A url like:
[nourl]http://www.example.com/category/nameofpage.html[/nourl]
can be either static or dynamic. I generate all my pages dynamic and they all look like the example above through some simple mod rewrite rules.
How the hell would a Search Engine know the difference?
How would it make any difference for SEO?

 

google takes dinamic pagesm but static is better. If you have dinamic pages just make a good sitemap (and submit to google) and, if possible, remove id sessions

 

Yes but doesn't Google say that it prefers static links as they are easier to crawl and get indexed?

 

I agree with most posts in here. I am very curious about your url, satyam. Do you mind to post it in here?

 

WTH? How would google know if its static or dynamic if you generate clean urls via mod rewrite.
I can throw up the same page as a static html or dynamic and you wouldn't even know the difference.
My homebrew cache on my photo website works this way. Some pages are static and some dynamic. I challenge everyone to tell me which is which.
It is obvious on some of the pages that I cannot rewrite but most of them there is no way you, Google or Santa Claus can tell the difference.

Tell me which one of the two is static and which one is dynamic:
http://www.aguntherphotography.com/tutorials/raw-hdr-processing.html
http://www.aguntherphotography.com/tutorials/workflow4.htm

 

Yeah, you had stated your point and everyone seems to agree. No need for "WTH" statement.

 

Maybe not but everyone keeps repeating the same false statement over and over again. Sorry for trying to set things straight and helping someone out.

 

Andre75 is right. Listen to him.

They say a badly structured dynamic link could be harder to index. That does NOT mean a static link by default is easier to index.

 

Look at DP as an example, it ranks for some really big keywords in SE's

 

O.K. Maybe I came off a bit strong so here it goes:

This is bad:
[nourl]http://www.example.com/index.php?p=388783&blubb=9&bla=5[/nourl]
even worse if this page serves the same content when you write:
[nourl]http://www.example.com/index.php?p=388783&bla=5&blubb=9[/nourl]
(see how the variables are changed, so its two urls but for the same page, thats bad)

This is good:
[nourl]http://www.example.com/category/pagetitle.html[/nourl]

Both can be served from a dynamically generated page though.

 

Google says that if you have too many parameters or a parameter named "id" the page will not get indexed.

e.g.
ht tp://www.somesite.com/script.php?p1=bla&p2=blab&p3=blaba&p4=kraka&p5=zaza&p6=screwthis**

or

ht tp://www.somesite.com/welcome.php?p=acctinfo&id=2131

 

Might not. They index them just fine in most cases.

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=allinurl:id+site:www.royalsoc.ac.uk&btnG=Search&meta=

 

google will index both dynamic and static pages (normal html pages and html pages with mod_rewrite) but google will index static pages with a better speed

 

Why do you put unsubstantiated and unproven claims here?
Why don't you check out the two urls above and tell me which one is indexed with "a better speed" and why.
If Google cannot tell the difference, how can they index one faster then the other?
If you insist to built your sites with Netscape Communicator or Notepad I don't mind, but don't put out those false claims.