Ahh... but suicide bombers work. Remember the rule: If it's stupid and it works, then it's not stupid.
It won't work if they are kept in a distance. Adjustment to this kind of strategy is highly recommended though and should be considered as a major serious threat, even NOW!
Xbox general has spoken, pentagon can close shop and generals can stop making war plans. Too bad the xbox general doesn't know shit about any of this stuff.
The trouble is keeping people at a distance, and still living in a free society. A single suicide bomber is almost impossible to stop. How many Egyptian students do we have in the U.S. right now? How hard would it be for an Iranian suicide bomber to get a fake Egyptian identity and come to the U.S. as a student? Close that avenue down and they will just come in across the Canadian border. Convince the Canadians to spend money to adopt the same immigration controls as us and the Iranians will just come by sea and make surreptitious night landings on our almost completely unprotected coasts. And these are just the problems with suicide bomb attacks on U.S. soil. The Iranians are planning to use most of those suicide bombers regionally. They plan to send the majority of them into Iraq and Israel, but also to other U.S. allies such as Kuwait and Qatar. This is another reason why a nuclear strike makes the most sense. We kill all of the suicide bombers before they leave the country.
You're right there is a problem, this why I keep on preaching to outlaw islam as an ideology. That would help solve most of the problem. It is very clear and at hand that islam contradicts our constitutions. We have to go more into offensive and don't need to accept their nonsense of religion when it is proven that 97 percent in their book is political and therefore nothing to do with religion and god and whatsoever. It's about worldly power islam seeks to achieve in a way we can't accept. We shouldn't blind ourselves by even thinking that islam is spiritual minded.
That just doesn't have any "sell" power. In America, the government very seldom screws with individual religions. We have a clear mandate in the 1st Amendment which keeps the government in line. Most of us would rather see New York, D.C, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Houston annihilated in nuclear attacks than to see the 1st Amendment stepped on like that.
Will, did you realize that you regard it as a religion? There is the mainpoint to start with. It is not a religion but an ideology. There are good signs coming from Australia. Many bear this in mind but only a few are ready to admit it. No need to be afraid of this - I'd say. It serves for those who are oppresed by this ideology as well. We need to start at home in our countries first.
spoken like a true facist, its actually kind of scary that you don't recognize what is wrong with this statement I read that the soviets used to fine people for belief in god, maybe we could fine people for believing in islam.
omg, I can't even believe what a clown you are , in such a fantasy land Iran is big trade partners with the EU and China, it is fantasy that we would start nuking them
We should be more tolerant of islam's scriptures to kill the infidels. Ferret volunteers to be first.
Silly, we have finish with Iraq before we can have another war, next election most of the pro-war people will be gone The public has seen what a mess going into Iraq was , no one is going to support another war Unless someone can make up something to start the war while bush is still in office, really doubtful there will be an Iran war
ferret: All of your analysis fails for the same reason: it assumes that the enemy does not exist. I believe this is an important point. Every post you have made only makes sense if the reader assumes that the enemy we are facing is completely fabricated. You are focusing on the enemy at home (me, George Bush, Christians, Republicans, Wal-Mart, etc..) while implicitly denying the existence of a foreign enemy.
You seem to have a lack of knowledge of islam strategy and this is exactly what you're supporting, willingly or otherwise. They speculate on the cat and mouse-game to create as much damage as possible, with the slogan "not all, just a few" Statistically, since 911 we have had about 20000 "not all, just a few hardcore cases" and millions are waiting to be released for the jihad. Hundreds of millions waiting in queue to be installed for infrastructure after every strike. Count them together, what's left to be considered moderate?
Maybe we could forget the crazy extremists and worry about our missile defense program. If we focused on people coming into this country, we could weed out a lot of terrorists before they have a chance to attack us. The war in Iraq hasnt solved anything, it has hurt us (the US) more than anything. As for Iran, they are all talk. It would be insane to try an attack because we could wipe them off the map within 24 hours should they be stupid enough to attempt a nuclear attack against us. Why dont we focus on a real threat to humanity, such as DARFUR
That's what you perceive Bush to be doing because he's targeting your nearest & dearest, the people he targets kill innocent people on purpose though. Why does those countries make threats of wiping countries off the map? do they want the USA in rubble? You need a wake up call, you are a propaganda machine. What you just claimed is FALSE & you definitely know so, this leads to the question of; why do you openly flat out lie? I will show proof if needed of the Iranians makng threats to the USA even coming right from their own mouths. Lol