GTech, I have already told you countless times that I am against terrorists as much as you are but we need to see proof rather than the usual crap spooned down to the sheeple almost immediately after the incident like we did on 9/11. According to your illustrious hero's they had no idea who was responsible yet well within 24 hours we had a list of those responsible, controlled by some fook in a high tech bat cave in the arsehole end of nowhere. Just look at how many dodgy Bin Laden videos we were shown following the attack, there is still no proof that it was Bin Laden behind 9/11 other than some extremely ropey videos where he claimed responsibility. As he was a CIA creation (just like al-Qaeda) surely the CIA has to shoulder some blame for the attacks? As I told lorien it is futile debating with you sheeple because you fail to understand that politicians lie, they always have and always will do, it's inherent. The deaths of circa 3,000 innocent people is absolutely nothing to lunatics like Bush and Cheney in the grander scheme of things and what they have been able to achieve since 9/11 for themselves and the people controlling them.
Thanks, watching/listening to it now. I couldn't get it to load the other day when you posted it. The first 5-10 minutes immediately reminded me of one of Ann Coulter's quotes, which also is a reminder of AGS, Briant, Ferret and some of the others here:
Ah... the old "demand proof that does not and can not exist" ploy. We've never seen that one from AGS before.
Irrelevant as usual GT because you know I'm not a liberal. I thought you might have figured that one out by now with the amount of awsome posts I have made in this P&R forum.
The problem is, your statements do not match up with what you say. This is called cognitive dissonance, which I, Lorien and others have pointed out numerous times, in addition to your actions that exactly match delusional disorder. Have you considered that maybe the problem isn't everyone else? You'll be the first to make a new post damaging America, but when someone makes a post about terrorists, like yesterday when you said something reminded you of the twin towers, you'll be the first to step in and suggest someone thinks "all" muslims are terrorists. Maybe you are just so delusional that you don't think people remember the support you give terrorists day in and day out? Either that, or you are clearly a pathological liar. I try to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you won't let me.
I must have missed those. Could you perhaps point out one single post that you have ever made here that wasn't senseless idiocy?
You come off as anti-authority, anti-Western, anti-Christian, definitely anti-Jewish, pessimistic and one generally against anything good for the world. The only thing you don't seem to be "anti" is terrorism. Never a bad word.
Wrong again babe, I am not against America, never have been and never will be. It is the dangerous lying corrupt insane lunatics in charge of America that I hate. And yes, I thought my post yesterday about the towers was very good, because it mirrored exactly what I think about what happened on 9/11. Stop supporting these people GT, wake yourself up to the BS man! I think you are beyond help but I promise you I will keep trying sir.
No, because Ron Paul hasn't said much in re 9/11 and what he has said is about the power grab after the fact. Here are two example: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul200.html http://www.antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=2372
Once again with the cognitive dissonance. Clearly, this gives aid and comfort to terrorists...terrorists just a few posts earlier you claim to be against. Never a bad word...
Jesus Christ mate of course I am anti-authority! Especially when the authority is as corrupt as it is. These idiots certainly do not have the best interests of me and you at heart mate, strewth wake up sonny you're embarrassing yourself now.
Ron Paul would do well to spend more time studying Thomas Jefferson and what had to be done to eventually resolve the issues with Arab terrorism in his day. Ron is really on the wrong side of this issue and that's sad, because it seems that he genuinely tries to do the right thing.
He does also come across as a plain lunatic but i sense you was trying to be nice You sound like a little child that just likes to rebel against authority & will support anything even terrorists that go against authority.
If someone is pro-authority then there is good chance they are jackass Who the hell wants people budding in their lives, and telling them what to do
Great point buddy. Seems we have a few pro-authority masochists right here in our very own P&R forum though.
much like people who deny global warming are always al gore haters? your generalities are usually pretty amusing & weird.. this one is no different.
Haha, if you didn't have people in charge of countries then you would be complaining, think about that & get back to me.
I am anti-authority personally, but I am smart enough to know that the choices are living with our government (bad) or with an Islamist government (worse). Sure, I am all for reforming our government to be less authoritarian: legalizing drugs, getting rid of racial quotas, open up immigration, reducing federal regulation, stopping all price supports, removing all tariffs, erasing gun laws, etc... However, any sane person can see that the government which we have is a million times better than pretty much any alternative. When monkey boys jump around screaming "Bush is Hitler" and "The CIA blew up the World Trade Centers", I naturally realize that those people are not on our side. They are giving aid and comfort to the enemy and therefore they are the enemy. I wish that I could buy them all airline tickets to Iran, right before the first nuclear bomb hits.