U.S. taxpayer cost of the Iraq War.

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by kafer, May 3, 2007.

  1. #1
    kafer, May 3, 2007 IP
  2. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #2
    Sure it is. Sooner or later they are gunna find dem dere dang WMDs.
     
    guerilla, May 3, 2007 IP
  3. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    It's throwing me a 404
     
    Toopac, May 3, 2007 IP
  4. ezguy

    ezguy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,184
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    128
    #4
    sure enough the goverment might have removed the page :)
     
    ezguy, May 3, 2007 IP
  5. allout

    allout Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,000
    Likes Received:
    461
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    340
    #5
    This does not even include the other cost, like lives, damaged families, inflated prices on goods such as plywood, and many other cost of war.

    It's good to know though that Bush still thinks we are doing good and should stay the course!:rolleyes:

    Just use http://nationalpriorities.org/
     
    allout, May 3, 2007 IP
  6. ReadyToGo

    ReadyToGo Peon

    Messages:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Well, on one hand, government spending has helped the economy.
     
    ReadyToGo, May 3, 2007 IP
  7. allout

    allout Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,000
    Likes Received:
    461
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    340
    #7
    :D

    It helped the big companies! Not the little man, taxes up, gas up, food up, etc...

    Seen nothing it done for me except prove that Bush Sucks!
     
    allout, May 3, 2007 IP
  8. kafer

    kafer Peon

    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Well something happened to that web site for sure. It's down! and all other sites that used to display the counter are also down.
    How strange? :confused:

    Any way the Cost of Iraq War calculator is set to reach $456 billion September 30, 2007.
     
    kafer, May 3, 2007 IP
  9. ReadyToGo

    ReadyToGo Peon

    Messages:
    2,853
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    You should know that inflation is a sign of expansion except in times of stagflation.
     
    ReadyToGo, May 3, 2007 IP
  10. kafer

    kafer Peon

    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    What would it buy?

    The current spending request would push the total for Iraq to $564 billion, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

    This article sums it all: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003689462_warcost02.html



    If you are keen to view the counter, check it out here. It's running still on a cached page by google, they've missed that out!

    The page will open but very slow. The cost of war counter works there.

    once the page is opened, if it shows 0 refresh it again:

    http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:...priorities+iraq+cost&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=uk
     
    kafer, May 3, 2007 IP
  11. Mr_2

    Mr_2 Peon

    Messages:
    980
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    thas what they call freedom of speech!!
    hahaha I think they took down the web site?!!
     
    Mr_2, May 3, 2007 IP
  12. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Actually the sites back up.

    "They" you make it sound like you don't have it lol
     
    Toopac, May 3, 2007 IP
  13. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #13
    It's actually better to gauge the scale of this BS war on the amount of innocent lives lost. Money can just be reprinted.

    Thousands upon thousands of innocent people have been killed yet we still see a load of pricks here banging the war drum sat in their nice comfy houses behind their lovely PCs. ;)
     
    AGS, May 3, 2007 IP
  14. Bestmiler

    Bestmiler Peon

    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    We'll find out soon enough.
     
    Bestmiler, May 3, 2007 IP
  15. kafer

    kafer Peon

    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    1-The UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan declared that the US-led invasion of Iraq was an illegal act that contravened the UN charter.

    2- The occupation is considered as the supreme Crimes against Peace by the standard of the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal 1946
    (article 6).

    3-In 2004 Les Roberts, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health found that 84% of 100,000 or more Iraqi deaths since the invasion had been caused by the actions of "coalition" forces, with 95 per cent of those deaths due to air strikes and artillery.

    4-In 2006 A more recent study of the same group Les Roberts Lancet, estimated that 655,000 Iraqis have died as a result of the invasion since 2003 .


    Sure, the Iraqis are killing each other and the terrorists are enjoying their slice of the cake too. However it is the American army that is by far committing a major crime against humanity using sophisticated weapons, with an unimaginable fire-power that cause the killing of Iraqis at a very large scale. Falluja the city that was totally ruined and where banned weapons such as napalm gas and other outlawed weapons were used against civilians is a good example of the cruelty of the occupier.


    Who elected criminals to be their leaders?
    Who is the pay master for all these onslaughts?

    Should the American people take responsibility for the war crimes committed by their leaders?

    Or perhaps the issue is too complicated to put the blame on them, given that they have been lied too (WMD, Saddam & 911, Niger uranium forgeries, Powell presentation at the UN, etc…). May be they were misled by the corporate media or because their fear was exploited at the top level, especially after the horrendous 9/11 crime committed by terrorists against them.
     
    kafer, May 3, 2007 IP
  16. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    And then you has those that advocate peace & terrorism from behind their PC with their radiators turned on full:rolleyes:
     
    Toopac, May 3, 2007 IP
  17. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #17
    Why does advocating peace have to be synonymous with advocating terrorism?
     
    guerilla, May 3, 2007 IP
  18. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    In some cases this that is true, by using the guise of peace to let terrorists do what they want, but what i mean't was, to be clearer:

    And then you has those that advocate peace from behind their PC with their radiators turned on full.

    And then you has those that advocate terrorism from behind their PC with their radiators turned on full.

    Hence "peace & terrorism"
     
    Toopac, May 3, 2007 IP
  19. Stax_Daniel

    Stax_Daniel Guest

    Best Answers:
    0
    #19
    whether the war was happening or not...we'd still be paying the taxes...;)
     
    Stax_Daniel, May 3, 2007 IP
  20. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    So you don't get your taxes back if there's no war going on?




    :(



    lol, good point
     
    Toopac, May 3, 2007 IP