NATO troops kill 75 Islamic Fascists

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by d16man, May 1, 2007.

  1. #1
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP
  2. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #2

    That is fantastic news mate, only one NATO injured too, none killed. :)

    I still fail to see how it's bad news for the Dems though, I would even go as far as saying that it's good news for everyone. ;)

    EDIT: LOL just because I completely disagree wish Bush's fake war on terror does not make me a terrorist supporter mate, you need to start thinking more before you post such crap.
     
    AGS, May 1, 2007 IP
  3. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #3
    If the war is fake there, then NATO killing those people is unjustified isn't it AGS? You should be outraged at the imperialism shown here. NATO going into an innocent country, full of innocent people, and killing them. You should be saddened and shocked.

    If you are willing to continue jumping through those hoops. Come on puppy, jump!
     
    lorien1973, May 1, 2007 IP
  4. Jackuul

    Jackuul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    115
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #4
    Of all the horrible news today, 75 people killed in a gun battle. My oh my what a travesty. I shall become a human shield - wait, I have a better idea, I'll send my son instead. I will put him in butter and cheese, and then drop him off right in the middle of Iran where he can be recognized.

    travesty -> joyous event
    human shield - > tank
    son -> nuclear weapon
    butter and cheese -> B52 bomber
    recognized -> a 50 megaton explosion
     
    Jackuul, May 1, 2007 IP
  5. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #5
    I think hell just froze over...AGS actually said something good about terrorists being killed....would he have said the same if he knew that the majority of the NATO troops were from the US and England?
     
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP
  6. Toopac

    Toopac Peon

    Messages:
    4,451
    Likes Received:
    166
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Exactly, does AGS actually think about his whole plan before posting?
     
    Toopac, May 1, 2007 IP
  7. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #7
    As I have said countless times I am against all terrorists, whether they be Islamic or the ones in the White House.
     
    AGS, May 1, 2007 IP
  8. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #8
    theres the good ol AGS we all know and love...Bush is a terrorist...but do me a favor, and go back and answer Lorien's ??'s...
     
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP
  9. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #9
    Is d16man finally starting to see the light? :eek:
     
    AGS, May 1, 2007 IP
  10. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #10
    Is AGS ignoring the previous post by lorien, and the followup by myself? Seems to me that you don't want to respond to that one.
     
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP
  11. Jackuul

    Jackuul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    115
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #11
    Bush isn't a terrorist. Bush is an ape-man who toasted his mind on coke long ago... McCain 08! I hated what Bush did to McCain in 00, smearing him and acting like daddy's little rich bitch. But hey, the American people wanted a retard, they got a retard.\

    And in 04 it was either the retard or the retarded-looking-windbag.
     
    Jackuul, May 1, 2007 IP
  12. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #12
    McCain is almost as dangerous to america as shrillary....that man cannot decide which side of the fence he really wants to be on, and therefore must jump back and forth as much as he can.
     
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP
  13. Jackuul

    Jackuul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    115
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #13
    He's just playing that for Votes. All of them will do anything for votes. Too bad we don't have a Teddy Roosevelt to vote for...
     
    Jackuul, May 1, 2007 IP
  14. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #14
    I prefer ronald reagan...he had the hollywood appeal and the true conservative nature.
     
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP
  15. AGS

    AGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,543
    Likes Received:
    257
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    265
    #15
    The war is a total sham and the troops should not even be there but if they have to be there I would rather them shoot at the Taleban than innocent civillians. ;)
     
    AGS, May 1, 2007 IP
  16. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #16
    Since the war is a fraud and sham, shouldn't they be tried for murder? The taliban have done nothing wrong, in your eyes, correct? What justifies them to be there? Come on, jump through the hoops AGS. Surely you do not support the wholesale slaughter of innocent Taliban, do you?
     
    lorien1973, May 1, 2007 IP
  17. Jackuul

    Jackuul Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,972
    Likes Received:
    115
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #17
    Taleban? Hell, I'd shoot telemarketers too, or the makers of that horrid children's show that my younger relative watches 'dragontales'.

    But by all means, kill telemarketers. They don't stop calling. They're terrorist.
     
    Jackuul, May 1, 2007 IP
  18. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #18
    if they didn't HIDE behind innocent children and women then it wouldn't be a problem...

     
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP
  19. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    It's time to break out the bullets, dipped in pigs blood. Take away the possibility of molesting little girls (virgins) and they have no reason to kill others.

    Those brave "mujahadeen" have a long history of hiding behind women and children. Such brave warriors of "allah" :rolleyes:
     
    GTech, May 1, 2007 IP
  20. d16man

    d16man Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,900
    Likes Received:
    160
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #20
    very much like AGS hides behind his computer, and gworld behind his boy toys...
     
    d16man, May 1, 2007 IP