And I thought there was an issue with global warming? Then why not jet pool there way to the debates, instead of each of them flying on their own private jet??? Just goes to show that dems say one thing, then do another. http://www.newsday.com/news/politic...47,print.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines
So by your logic, if one democrat says that they act a certain way all democrats then have to act that way. I guess the same rule applies for republicans too. Thanks to Mark Foley I guess all republicans are now guilty sending dirty emails to underage kids! Those naughty repubs!
Excellent use of the "all" card, Chant! In the case of democrats, they actually molest kids, then issue pardons for doing so. What was it Foley was convicted of? Oh, wait...I know; nothing
Aw shucks, I'm just using the same sort of logic that dman and yourself used first in this thread. I mean, if you guys are going to lump all the members of one political group together, why not carry it through for the members of that other major political party? So you mean Foley got away with sending lewd emails to underage kids and got away scott free, just like you hate Mel Reynolds of? Imagine my shock and horror! Hey, do you know that if you enter the words "republican convicted of molesting kids" into Google you get back 161,000 hits? If you type in the words "democrat convicted of molesting kids" you get back 252,000 hits? Now maybe you want to tell me which victim is more important to you, the one molested by a democrat or the one molested by a republican? Because it sounds like you have a preference or that you like to give a free pass to the ones that admit to their crimes but aren't charged in court for them. I guess that if it were your kid that Mark Foley was propositioning you wouldn't have had a problem, right? Interesting that you see a difference between people that have thoughts about molesting children based on their political affiliations.
I figured you would have something better than trying to compare Reynolds, who was actually convicted and later pardoned, to a few emails. I suppose if it were your kid Reynolds molested, you wouldn't have had a problem? Agree, it's very interesting that you see a difference between those that actually molest, then give pardons to their own, and those who send emails to adults of legal age. You're probably not a liberal either
I don't have to come back with a comparison to compare Reynolds to. It's very easy to Google for convincted child predators that are both democrat and republican. I even gave you the search terms and it certainly seems like you ignored them. I also think that it's pretty easy to glean from what I've said so far that I think all child molestors, whether they are democrat or republican, whether they are convicted or pardoned or admit to their crimes, are reprehensible. There's a straight answer but, like I said, it was pretty easy to figure that out from what I've been saying. I also think it's pretty telling that, when you are asked directly if a molesting victim is more important to you depending on which political bent the attacker was of, you can't even bring yourself to answer the question and instead dodge it by falling back to "Reynolds molested a kid and got away with it". In this debate you can't even bring yourself to a) recognize that republican politicians have molested children and that b) they deserve your scorn just as much as someone like Reynolds does. Wow. I thought that I had seen it all but someone separting the guilt level of child predators by their political ideology...again, wow. It's amazing to see.
There is no debate. Just a another mindless liberal taking a thread off topic with the usual drivel. You couldn't deal with the fact that liberals are all hat and no cattle, so you had to bring Foley in for moral equivalence. And it backfired on you Get with the program!
at least he did the respctable thing of stepping down....and guru, that had nothing to do with the thread topic....stay on topic or stay out please...
The problem is that the Bush Administration are such a complete and utter disaster it is very hard for people NOT to post a link sometimes.
again, what does that have to do with the thread topic? Or are you upset cause your liberal friends got caught? So therefore you change the subject...typical AGS.
The point being that "rich liberals" tend very strongly to be complete hypocrites. And yet Sam Walton drove a pickup truck and wore clothes from his own discount stores.
and the dems hate those stores because they are not unionized....Democrats do not want for people to think by themselves, dems want to think for everyone, which is why they tend to show socialist views on things. Its the same for global warming. They don't want people to think for themselves, they want to think for the people. This is why they can each take a private jet yet complain about how bad global warming really is.