Firstly, I don't like the idea of war. I'm not big on people dying, particularly the innocents who get caught in the middle. The difference in infrastructure and resources between Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia are enormous. When the US was supporting the Mujahideen in their war against the USSR, they weren't too worried about the oppression or hard line Islam in Afghanistan, just as they weren't too concerned about Saddam being a vile inhuman beast to the Iraqis when George Sr. supported him in the Iran/Iraq war. In my lying eyes, it would lend a lot of credibility to the war on terror if the American government took away the financial and diplomatic resources of Al Queda that originate in Saudi Arabia. Pomp and circumstance. If they are so crack up and on the job, why were known Al Queda members traveling to the US for flight training on their passports?
Who says they are not? I've seen numerous stories over the past few years of such. In fact, the NYT committed treason over this very program that has been highly successful, later admitting that it was wrong for them to expose the secret legal program. Now, or then? Who says they knew? Before establishing the premise of a question as factual, show that it is in fact, factual. It seems you are focusing on issues BEFORE 9/11 to dismiss their actions AFTER 9/11. I may not be understanding you here, but that's what I'm reading out of it.
GTech, give this a read. I'm sharing strictly in good faith. http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/brisard.pdf http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/baer.pdf
Thanks, but I tend to stay away from conspiracies. Conspiracy theories are not factual and are very difficult to debate with. Conspiracies are most often derived from personal feelings/agendas and facts will always trump personal feelings in a debate. Do you have anything non-conspiratorial to present that could establish the basis for the presumed validity of the questions?
I'd feel safe saying the domestic news we receive is manipulated by agendas. Read the second one, at least for the information about Saudia Arabia, although the first one is the smoking gun on transfers of money and support for Al Queda coming from SA. And yeah, while the CBC decided to put these in a directory called conspiracy theories, both men are experts in their field, not fringe lunatics.
the fact that brisard is french debunks the whole thing....they will do anything to make the terrorists look good.
What are you talking about? The interview is about exposing the sources of Al Queda funding. How does that make terrorists look good?
Mate you have to understand d16mans way of thinking (or should that be way of non-thinking? ) As for GTech, you are wasting your time, anything that doesn't follow the Governments or mainstream medias BS line of events he doesn't want to even think about, which is exactly why people like him are so easy to be controlled.
There's AGS, always offering a consoling word for those that seek to give terrorists credit away to others! LMAO! Projectionism at it's finest! Here we have tard who gets his news from alex "aids in the corn" jones, has been proven a liar hundreds of times, has had the conspiracies he lets others create (for profit) to control his own mind debunked time and again, gets his news from the very media like everyone else and as proof, his views on Iraq match the media's, gives aid and comfort to terrorists, never said a bad word about a terrorist, sold his own country and fellow servicemen out over Iran's illegal activities and makes up fantasy lies about some conspiratorial club called the "illuminati!" And you feel qualified to offer words of condolences to others? ROFLMAO! Delusional disorder at it's finest
Dude you really have to get rid of this fixation you seem to have that I only listen to what Jones says, I don't believe everything Jones says but a lot of what he says is true and backed up with facts. I trawl many places on the web for news, unlike you who gets your news spoon fed to you from your corrupt government via the mainstream media. As I have said before mate, you are the original sheeples sheeple.
So now you admit he, like yourself, is a liar; that you know this; and still let him do your thinking for you? That's even worse than I thought.
Dude what are you babbling on about, I am merely saying that I do not agree with everything he says. Stop trying to spin things GT, we're not in O'Reillys "spin zone" here.
No GTech, that was not what you pretty much said at all. You tried a bit of O'Reilly style spin on it and fell flat on your arse.
Why the crappy ripost GT? I already told you I don't let Jones do my thinking for me as I have already said a couple of posts up from this one. I know you are in a fanatical hurry to hit the big 10k but cut out the shitty posts mate, you will get there soon enough. Probably 2morrow night the rate that you post.
So you can dish it out, but you can't take it? LMAO! I'm just doing what you do Do you get on your own nerves?
Its a conspiracy theory, which makes it crap...there is not one ounce of proof anywhere in that....and like I said, because the guy is french that just debunks the whole theory....sorry you have such a hard time understanding...if you use your brain that might help.