All MFA sites are stealers, stealers of money from advertisers, you give no useful content , and you are trying to earn money that you do not deserve, make some original content and earn money in honest way...
Yes and no. The problem is that the term "MFA" has come to mean exactly what you say above...I, myself, am guilty of using the term that way, too. There are really two types of MFA site. There is the type you describe, the arbitraging, low-click-paying, contentless or scraped content sites that are churned out solely for the purpose of making money and serve no other need. There is, however, a minority of "MFA" sites that are good. Yes, the original incentive for the owner to create the site may have been to put adsense on it, however he has decent, original content and has turned it into a site with useful information. I have no problem with the latter site, the former needs to be removed from the face of the earth. I submit that we need to use a more correct term than simply "MFA" to use for the first type of site that I describe above.
I do agree with Adpubster here, & there is definitely big difference between the Markov or other script created once, and good info filled MFA sites.
I dont think that visitor from MFA sites are to bad. But sure, quality is not the same like from engine ads.
so let's talk about promoting site and getting a good traffic in small period of time . what is the best ways , google adword take will be very expensive , for the kind of site that i want "ex : a mass blogging sites" dating site and so on , and please what is the best ppc program after adsense , i can't found any thing good anyone know a really good company that pay ?
Im confused. Maybe I just think of MFA as something different. I think of it, as any site, that someone planned to use adsense to get revenue from. Why does that mean automatically mean low quality to all of you? I have plenty of sites with unique 1000+ word high quality articles, the best articles on the subject imo available (And my SERP(s) support that ) that hgave been ranking in the top 3, or number 1 for 2+ years. I consider them MFA, because, I made them with adsense revenue in mind. But I also spent 2-3 hours researching and writing each article, some sites having 5, but others as many as 100 articles (so some as many as 300 hours of work put into them). It really makes no sense, I can have a custom site built for a few grand, but if im building it and plan on using adsense as my primary revenue generator, isn't it still MFA? Or does the quality of the site, make it not a MFA anymore? Honestly, after you have a site that makes 20 or so bucks a day off adsense, do you not plan on putting adsense on your future sites? Doesn't that in theory, make all your future Sites MFA? You didn't make them for amazon did ya?
Nice catch paraphrase WunschShrek. I did the same way like you. What I did is for adsense, after succeed on my first trial. since then never look back (and never amazon.. LOL). You can also refer to this: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=241165
Thanks for the link, it seems the guy Jabb over there thinks like me =D Yeah I can see what you guys mean now tho. So if a site actually offers unique, informative information, it is not a MFA site in regards to most people, MFA means the useless, scraped, garbage content sites that were made with adsense in mind, not the unique well written informative ones. Sound right? Makes sense to me I never messed with any of those auto-updating scraped BS you see for sale so much on these forums. I always put my visitors first (good content, easy navigation, etc, etc) and adsense second lol (although closely second)
We're going to start calling them MFAA sites See: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=2892334&postcount=24