Google's loving of wikipedia is going too far...

Discussion in 'Google' started by relixx, Apr 18, 2007.

  1. #1
    I did a search for the phrase hypnosis information and saw a brief definition from wikipedia just above the results. Same for the phrase SEO information.

    Has anyone else noticed this? If it is only showing info like that from Wikipedia you may as well rename wikipedia "googlepedia" or something... :mad:
     

    Attached Files:

    relixx, Apr 18, 2007 IP
    Endurer likes this.
  2. bacanze

    bacanze Peon

    Messages:
    2,419
    Likes Received:
    127
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Wow, havent seen that before, I also agree will you.
     
    bacanze, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  3. trichnosis

    trichnosis Prominent Member

    Messages:
    13,785
    Likes Received:
    333
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #3
    google and yahoo is changing their algo. according to the wikipedia. i hate this:mad:
     
    trichnosis, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  4. relixx

    relixx Active Member

    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #4
    well, i did some more checks, its appearing for karate information and kung fu information, but the kung fu and SEO entries weren't very relevant...

    [edit]seems that if you slap "information" onto a lot of words it shows a piece from wikipedia. aarrrg.
     
    relixx, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  5. boldy

    boldy Peon

    Messages:
    561
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    these days SE's throws much more traffic to wiki ... for most of informative KW wiki is ranked Number one.

    Trustable site + less work for SERPS :)

    More work for Webmasters and SEO's :eek:
     
    boldy, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  6. Swefx

    Swefx Guest

    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    What does it matter if it show's a quick definition from wikipedia? It's a great informational site and deserves as much traffic as it can get.
     
    Swefx, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  7. relixx

    relixx Active Member

    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #7
    relixx, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  8. Your Content

    Your Content Banned

    Messages:
    1,096
    Likes Received:
    45
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Another Wikipedia's annoyance... its crappy background, a large bmp file that eats lots of system resources and causes system crashes regardless OS or hardware you are using to surf :mad:
     
    Your Content, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  9. bochgoch

    bochgoch Peon

    Messages:
    1,918
    Likes Received:
    67
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    It's particularly annoying when google also lists wikipedia stubs ...
     
    bochgoch, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  10. Canadianbacon

    Canadianbacon Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    76
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    173
    Articles:
    1
    #10
    i've always felt that wikipedia is gettin way too much of a push.
     
    Canadianbacon, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  11. checksum

    checksum Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #11
    Of course you do, you're probably losing money because of it, but at the same time the rest of the internet finds it useful. There's not much that can be done about that.

    Pick your battles people.
     
    checksum, Apr 18, 2007 IP
    jhmattern likes this.
  12. Mong

    Mong ↓↘→ horsePower

    Messages:
    4,789
    Likes Received:
    734
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #12
    Google founders love wikipedia and admire it so why not we should be imposed with their likings? :rolleyes:
     
    Mong, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  13. Endurer

    Endurer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    84
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #13
    I will have to agree on that. There are many websites that should be considered authority on the subjects that they are covering. It's not the case here, I see wikipedia's poorly researched pages getting top positions in SERPS whereas those more-to-the-point website pages are at number 2 or three position.
     
    Endurer, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  14. Bender

    Bender Peon

    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    358
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    "information" and "info" are like Google search commands. If you search for "keyword + information" or "keyword + info", the first result will be from Wiki, if that keyword exists in the encyclopedia.
     
    Bender, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  15. butterfingers

    butterfingers Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,142
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    128
    #15
    Too bad Wikipedia don't have adsense on it.
    If not, the owner become a billionaire.
    : )
     
    butterfingers, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  16. checksum

    checksum Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #16
    http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&q=pool+information

    I don't think so, Wiki is no where to be seen in these results.
     
    checksum, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  17. Endurer

    Endurer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    84
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #17
    Endurer, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  18. Bender

    Bender Peon

    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    358
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    Bender, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  19. checksum

    checksum Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #19
    I don't see info or information in the query, which is what I was responding to.

    That aside, did you look at the article? It deserves the high ranking.

    Ah, my bad. Still though, internet users like Wikipedia and it does offer good information. I think it deserves its place.
     
    checksum, Apr 18, 2007 IP
  20. tradeya

    tradeya Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    275
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #20
    my site name has no meaning in wikipedia... if i put my site name, definitely it will say there is no meaning of this words...
     
    tradeya, Apr 18, 2007 IP