10 reasons why you should vote for Ron Paul in 2008.

The "who?" Tell me you didn't just say "illuminati" in a post while trying to hide the agenda of someone you support? The truth begins to rear it's ugly head

 

So, who are you going to vote for Gtech, browntwn? I have to hear this one. Please, share with me.

Everyone attacks Ron Paul, but no one will tell me who they are voting. Please, do so. I assure you, pound for pound I will go after their views and show how Ron Paul is still better. Who are voting for Gtech, McCain, Jeb Bush, Giuliani perhaps? Maybe you will vote for Barack? I can tell you why everyone of these guys will do nothing to help America.

Hillary was at Bilderberg 2006. This is not a conspiracy theory, it is true. High ranking presidential candidates usually attend before running for office. It is so obvious that Americans have no choice in who becomes president. Hillary? OMG. Is New Zealand a good place to live? This country will fall, and I don't know if we have a chance.

 

It's way to early for me, tesla, but as of now, I'm *leaning* towards Mitt Romney. I don't care for McCain. I can't vote democrat because they have let the far left fringe lunatics of their party run amok and take over and have passionately proven time and again that national security of our country is nothing more than a joke to them.

Personally I'd like to see Kinky Freidman from Texas run. He's an independent and I voted for him, but independents rarely win. Joe Lieberman was the exception to that, whom I also like. He's a reasonable democrat which is a rare thing these days.

I would also look at any Libertarian contenders as long as 9/11 conspiracies were not part of their package.

 

I like obama, Ron Paul sounds like a hick

 

Thirty-six percent is also about the same percent who consider themselves republicans.

 

That has just shocked the sh*t out of me because Kinky was also questioning the massive 9/11 lie.

He is a good guy but as you said, he has absolutely zero chance of winning.

It will be the fake mayor against Hillary, and we'll all have to put up with these dumbass "fake debates" just like we had to do with skull and bones members Bush and Kerry back in 2k4.

 

Sounds like a hick? Did you bother to go to "any" of the links I posted? You know what, never mind, I can already tell you didn't............

Thats the problem, you worry about how people "sound" rather than what they believe in. At least Gtech can give an explanation for his views. You sound as if you only pay attention to the fancy wrapping.

Do you like not being able to protect your family with guns? Obama will give that do you. He just "loves" tough gun control, which also stands for gun confiscation.

Here is another quote from Barack Obama, taken from Wiki:

he defended the New Deal social welfare policies of Franklin D. Roosevelt, associating Republican proposals to establish private accounts for Social Security with Social Darwinism.

WTF, are you kidding me? Roosevelt passed the New Deal to help Americans get through the Great Depression. Social welfare policies are the LAST thing we need. Stay tuned, I've got some more........

Another political view of Obama:

Health care

On January 24, 2007, Obama spoke about his position on health care at Families USA, a health care advocacy group. Obama said, "The time has come for universal health care in America . . . I am absolutely determined that by the end of the first term of the next president, we should have universal health care in this country." Obama went on to say that he believed that it was wrong that forty-six million Americans are uninsured, noting that taxpayers already pay over $15 billion dollars annually to care for the uninsured.

Umm, Obama, who is going to pay for Americans to get Universal Healthcare?

 

Pretty much one in the same there. Anyone can craft a clever poll to extract what they want.

 

Alright, Gtech, I've dropped some bombs on Obama, time to go after Mitt Romney, one of your potential votes. Here is one view of Mitt Romney:

This is a violation of the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Any issue which is not covered in the Constitution must be decided on a state, not Federal level.

Therefore, as president, Mitt Romney has no right to pass a law banning abortion, because that is not the Job of the Federal Government. That is a state issue.

I don't support abortion or gay marriage personally, but states must choose, not Washington.

Here is another one Mitt Romney:

Gun control

See also: Governorship of Mitt Romney#Other issues

Romney in past campaigns has described himself as a proponent of gun control. For Romney' s 1994 US Senate campaign, he supported the Brady Bill, which imposed a five-day waiting period on gun sales, and a ban on particular assault weapons.


Your candidate supports gun control Gtech! Is he Republican? He is no different than Barack Obama!!

 

BTW, here's the real reason he can't be elected:

http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst040907.htm

 

If he was, he kept it pretty low profile. Most people don't actually question anything about 9/11, they just take talking points from others who create *for profit* conspiracies to elicit financial gain from gullible white males because they are an easy target to prey on.

That election is was from last year.

 

Yeah, that is the truth. The Fed hates Ron Paul, because if he becomes president, he will wipe the floor with them.

 

Heh, yeah, that *must* be it. Because we all know how popular it is for young angry white males to absolve terrorists of their crimes out of some deep seeded feeling of guilt, self-loathing and low self-esteem

 

I don't have a candidate. It's rare to ever find a candidate who supports *everything* you want. That's why we have choices

 

OMG Gtech, this Matt Romney dude is terrible. This is his view on Immigration:

We need to make America more attractive for legal immigrants -- for citizens -- and less attractive for illegal immigrants. I want to see more immigration in our country, but more legal immigration and less illegal immigration."

WTF? He doesn't support "illegal" immigration, but he wants to see more immigrants in the country? And he wants to make all the illegals here legal? OMFG....

Allowing even legal immigrants to flood our countries borders is too much. Ron Paul will reduce both legal and illegal immigration, and he will not make the illegals here become legal!

 

Voting for Paul doesn't achieve anything, he is not going to win. The only thing it will do is potentially mark you for elimination as enemy of people, once socialists get full power. It also creates appearance of democratic process. It's too late for voting box, time to think about cartridge box, if you are in a state where 2nd amendment is still in force

 

Thanks! Have a source for that?

 

Sure I do:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Mitt_Romney

Pound for pound, I think Ron Paul will crush this guy. We have 300 million people, we don't need more immigrants, legal or illegal. His gun control policies sound a lot like Democrats, and his abortion views are a Constitutional violation. Even if you don't agree with Ron Paul's 911 views, he crushes this guy in every other area.

 

If I had to bet my life savings on it, I would agree with you. Americans are so brainwashed that I can almost guarantee Hillary will win.

I mean, why would the best man win the 08 election? They are not even giving Ron Paul news coverage. Viewers had to demand for his appearance on Fox News, and he only was on for 5 minutes.

Regardless, I will vote for him. If he loses, I can say I supported the Constitution, and a presidential candidate who follows it. Vote with the cartridge box? If a dictatorship happens in the U.S., I'm just going to pack my bags and leave.

It is not a question of being too weak to stay and fight. If my fellow Americans are too stupid to vote for a man who clearly has their best interests in mind, I'm going to have to go elsewhere, because it didn't have to get to the point where we had to vote with a cartridge box. It just was a matter or thinking outside the box.

Then again, where in the hell would I run? They don't call it the "New World Order" for nothing..........

 

That's not unreasonable and is within reason of what I've posted in the past regarding illegal immigration. Though I'm definitely for reducing legal immigration.

Tom Tancredo is another running on immigration platform.