MSN > Google?

Uhm... I doubt it. Trendy would be "look, everyone is using us" not "look, no one cares about MSN, so that makes us cool!" Unless Google develops some major problems. The reason Apple succeeded (somewhat) with Apple vs. PC commercials is that PCs have some really, really huge problems. Does Google ever go down, or take very long to load, and are most people upset about search results? No... There's not much to complain about.

 

you basically rephrased my points, thanks.

 

klown i got these number from a news paper "the economic times"
moreover i am an mba student and just made a 500 pages report on the same thing

the market share fo microsoft is 26% after the opening of live search engine.

(these data is not based on refral bases but its based on user count basis)


anyways thanks for showing your interest in my post

gaurav

 

No problem, can you post a link to the article?

Some links to the contrary.. Cnet
Market Wire Nielsen//NetRatings

 

Miscrosoft is a good company, but its search engine can't win Google in a short time

 

google will own your mother before microsoft even starts to have a competitive search engine.

 

I doubt Windows Live Search will ever be more popular than Google.

I can't imagine saying "MSN it" rather than "Google it" in the first place, even the kids around here know what Google is and some don't know what yahoo or MSN Search (they know about MSN Messenger for sure >_>) is, rather than search for it, Google it has become a term used now.

Google loads much faster, has really good results. I don't see a reason to use Windows Live Search

 

No no no MSN damm it's the words betwen the big 3 Google Yahoo and MSN

No chance

 

Although Microsoft is nearly twice the size of Google, I don't think MSN can beat Ggogle.

 

It seems to me that Microsoft was quite able to overcome Lotus, Quattro, and Word Perfect by offering "suite" incentives to businesses. The Live agenda seems inline with their previous success in that method. I think this this a significant challenge for Google. It's not that Google or Borland, or WordPerfect Corp are/were technically deficient, it's that Microsoft has this huge customer installed base that they can conjure up and convince that their way is cheaper and provides an adequate solution.

 

google is so vulnerable for spam.... I think chacha may take em long term

 

No one knows what chacha is.

 

I wonder about the specs of the google server is lol.

 

I hate MSN because they dont ever show my sites any love.

 

Microsoft is bringing better, cleaner results than Google since March 7. Google has a lot of crap in their results now.

 

Google is King.

Monopoly should not be there.

 

people are not used to saech from MSn search ...
MSN is relationed whith messenger .
but in the domain of seach google is n:1 actually .

 

Doesn't Corel make Quattro and WordPerfect?

Anyway, they've really implented their Windows Live products in Windows Vista, like the Internet Explorer 7 search bar has live search for default, they have links to download Windows Live Messenger in the startbar, etc. etc. so their live products might eventually take over.

For now I'm sticking with Google for search.

 

MSN can never ever beat google ......MSN results stinks ....they are nt in a position to maintain stability with search results ...

if we can find our result on top page on one fine day ..we cant trace it in 1000 the next day ....

if this continues ...MSN has to face lots of difficulty ....

I feel it is staying in the market just because of the brand name it has created by the name MICROSOFT

 

Google's results SUCK! Period! Have you done a search lately???? I mean BESIDES the keyword that you use for your site! The algo change put them in the dark ages! Content DOES NOT matter to google anymore. MSN has more relevant results as it seems they adopted the old algo Google just changed. I could care less about the corporate mentality-MSN has better results and they WILL take over if Google keeps playing their algo games.