They claim to. How does that benefit you though? It's not uncommon for those who would never serve their country to ask others to do it for them. Same question to you, ferret. It seems like we have one side who would never serve their country, spends great effort in putting it down, admits to stealing his freedoms off others and has previously called soldiers "dumb"...verses another who stands up for his country, would serve his country, supports those who are serving their country. Gee, I wonder what the obvious differences are?
I think the main fact you need to remember GTech is that people like me and gworld have both served, are patriotic about our countrys but angry at all the lies and bullshit going on in the world by corrupt people like Blair and Bush who do not care what happens to any of the soldiers at the end of the day. They are just numbers, nothing more than that. I did my time for the queen between the ages of 16 and 21, long before I realised what corrupt people run our world.
The words you have conveyed in regards to the soldiers of your country that have been illegally kidnapped do not correspond with what you type above. In fact, nothing you normally communicate does. In fact, in this particular discussion, there is nothing about Bush or Blair to blame them for, yet you've once again whipped out the blame stick for them, while silently not having a negative word to say about Iran. You can't just jump up and be a patriot when the opportunity exists and expect people not to recall your real feelings conveyed day in and day out. When it comes to serving, you would be the last person in the world I would want by my side. No offense, but you'd surrender on my behalf in a heartbeat and have nothing but praise for our enemies. That is the exact reflection of your posts. Not trying to "personally attack" you here, just being bluntly honest. If treason is not the message you want your posts to reflect, you might consider toning the support for enemies of your country down a little
As I have said before GT if it wasn't for the lies that started this illegal invasion of Iraq then these troops would not have been in the area to get kidnapped in the first place. Bush and Blair are the two main reasons for the disaster in the Midlle East. I blame these troops capture on Bush and Blair, they should not have been out there in the first place.
So this is your excuse for supporting those that kidnap your country's soldiers? Have not others, countless times, proved what you conspire to be a lie, is not? Yet it has nothing to do with the current situation. As a reminder, unshakable beliefs in something untrue is considered delusion, a severe medical condition. I'm not trying to be cruel here, just pointing out the obvious. Once again, offering blame of Iran's actions to others. Not unlike how you give terrorist's credit to others as well. In your world, no one is responsible for their own actions because of your hatred towards those who are trying to take the people you support out. Sadly the people you give a pass to, terrorists, are responsible for their actions. They are responsible for blowing up other muslims, beheading people, killing anything with a lung, using children as bombs, roasting Christian children and returning them on a bed of rice, conducting military operations not in uniform, executing leaders of Iraq, blowing up your own country, blowing up Spain, blowing up the US, blowing up Israel, blowing up hotels, cars, buildings, planes, malls, buses, trains, subways and in general, killing anyone for the sake of virgins. And you give them a pass, every time. That is shameful. Right, we can't go around holding people responsible for their actions when Bush, Blair and the non-existent illuminati exist. No doubt you are a patriotic person. But it's not your country or countrymen you pledge your patriotism to. It's clear who you are patriotic towards.
Blair and Bush are lying corrupt politicians that have put troops of my country into this dangerous situation through their LIES to get us into this mess in the first place. That is why I am so angry with Bush and his pooooodle Blair.
Are you referring to your heroic fight in the battle of cafeteria when the 12 and 13 years students launched a frontal attack armed with books and supported by rulers and you strategically used your pamphlets to push them back? loud mouth sissy cheerleader or in the wise words of crazy rob: pussy.
You guys must be related. You're both negative, you both never contribute anything useful to a discussion and both resort to name calling and swearing when your called out. Come to think of it, you both run away when things are not going your way too. Drive by poster twins, AGS and Gworld. We're you both separated at birth?
LMAO you're a funny guy. You, GTech, latehorn, lorien, despunked, THREE PACK and many others in the crazy gang all post exactly the same here in this P&R forum. gworld a I do not follow each other around like you guys do and there is a much better quality to our posts.
It all sounds the same to you, because you don´t really read their posts. And if you do, you sure don´t listen. I think your mind is made up to the point where you don´t even consider a different opinion than your own.
But I do read their posts buddy, and to be honest with you there is absolutely no discernable difference between any of them.
talk is cheap, if there are two guys sitting on sofa and ones says "I don't give a crap" and the others says "Support the troops", is there really any difference?
I keep expecting him to dissapear after one of the child sex rings are busted, no luck so far, but something tells me he will be caught eventually saving other children from harm