Lorien you have AGS worked out; He posts a bombshell people point out he's crazy & things don't add up, then he disappears until his next crazy theory is posted
I have the same feeling for GTech as well Being put on the spot like that... He's still hoping for something new to come out that proves his ASSUMPTION was right after all. And with a big sigh of relief he will turn up again
I don't know. I think if they did stray into Iranian waters they have every right to capture them, but if they didn't, they should release them immediately.
Nope. Under the international law of the sea military vessels can not be seized for straying into another nation's territorial waters.
I have 3 words for you.. "Gulf of Tonkin", wait, some fat dike already said that... Damn you rosie, you fat whore.
I will give you some credit for a change Mia , you are slowly starting to wake up to how these people work. This false flag oppo is going to be very similar to the "Gulf Of Tonkin."
That was sarcasm... Rosie has no idea where the Gulf of Tonkin is, much less wtf she was talking about.
See following UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA Part II, Section 3, Sub-section C, Articles 29 and 30 to start with, although you can read in more depth if you really have the urge
your talking nonsense. Your the type of person who would want no war in iraq and that freak hitler, no saddam it is to still be in power. Your for peace. But to get peace you need war.
That is quite possibly the most stupid thing I have ever heard someone say in this forum. EDIT: Forget that, it certainly is the most stupid thing I have ever heard on this forum.
its very true...the only way you can get someone to leave you alone is to hammer the snot out of them...they will eventually leave...and you will have peace.
Man, that is awesome. I wonder if the Iranians were aware of this before they entered Iraqi waters and kidnapped those British sailors? I mean, I wonder if they knew that -- even according to their own official lies -- they were still legally in the wrong.
Looks like the mad moolahs actually planned this attack for retaliation against the UN... http://home.bellsouth.net/s/editori...rticle&render=y&ac=-2&ck=&ch=ne&rg=blsadstrgt
Could you post that specific paragraph Will as i have not been able to filter this out in the references provided. I didn't see anything specific directed towards:
I think it puts it in flowery legal language somewhere - it's a comprehensive document, and it's Saturday afternoon, so I haven't studied it verbatim. It's in there somewhere.