Strength of .edu links

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by tomflascee, Mar 26, 2007.

  1. #1
    How important are .edu links. Does anyone know of any authority sites or articles on the issue?
    Thanks
     
    tomflascee, Mar 26, 2007 IP
  2. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #2
    Links from .edu domains are no better than links from any TLD. Gooogle pays no attention to domain extentions.

    Matt Cutts covered this in one of his grab bag videos.
     
    stOx, Mar 26, 2007 IP
  3. gr8liverpoolfan

    gr8liverpoolfan Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,719
    Likes Received:
    538
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #3
    .edu links are no more valuable than links from any other extensions, as Matt said before me.

    However an edu is generally a respectable authority site, which cannot normally be manipulated for links. Therefore when you do get a link from an edu, it is thought that your site is genuinely good, and that is where the strength factor comes into play.
     
    gr8liverpoolfan, Mar 26, 2007 IP
  4. adamm

    adamm Peon

    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    well they are said to be "authority" sites and links from there are so much more expensive. Maybe the hype about authority sites will go down soon
     
    adamm, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  5. jdevalk

    jdevalk Active Member

    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #5
    "Authority sites" are no hype adamm... There are some sites out there which are able to rank for every keyword they write an article on, those are the "authorities" you're looking for, and links from them could be worth a fortune :)
     
    jdevalk, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  6. bobchrist

    bobchrist Active Member

    Messages:
    4,102
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    88
    #6
    It is also important that particular .edu site should have good PR.
     
    bobchrist, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  7. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #7
    PR is probably the least important thing.
     
    stOx, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  8. oseymour

    oseymour Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,960
    Likes Received:
    92
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #8
    I agree 110%. too much attention is being paid to PR
     
    oseymour, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  9. Roman

    Roman Buffalo Tamerâ„¢

    Messages:
    6,217
    Likes Received:
    592
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #9
    Aren't you contradicting yourself? By your second statement it would seem a .edu is more valuable.
     
    Roman, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  10. AfterHim.com

    AfterHim.com Peon

    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    51
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    .EDU's are generally more authoritative...their links don't matter more, but a .edu is generally more valuable so in turn the link is more valuable not because it is a .edu but because of the page strength.
     
    AfterHim.com, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  11. gr8liverpoolfan

    gr8liverpoolfan Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,719
    Likes Received:
    538
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    285
    #11
    What I meant is that if I were to acquire a new .edu domain today, the link benefit from it would be no different from a new.com today.

    Any respectable authority site, be it a .com or .edu isn't expected to be manipulated for links.

    Like afterhim.com said, the link is valuable, not because it comes from an.edu but because it comes from a page which has authority.
     
    gr8liverpoolfan, Mar 27, 2007 IP
  12. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #12
    Matt Cutts said something like;
    Even though Google doesn't give edu domains any more weight, edu's tend to host quality content that gets a lot of links, and as a result of that they do become authoritative sites... Though at creation, all TLD's are equal.
     
    stOx, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  13. djrishi

    djrishi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,243
    Likes Received:
    17
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #13
    it is as good as other tld's.
     
    djrishi, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  14. TorchedSEO

    TorchedSEO Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #14
    From my experiance .edu backlinks USED to be WAY better than .com/.net and I could prove it becuase other sites had 3,000 .com links and a few edu links but were at #2 and #3. I had 50 .com/.net links and 40 .edu links and was #1 for MANY keywords. But since the last update .edu's seem to have lost thier "juice" and now I need the 3000 links to stay at #1, without them I would be stuck at #4 or #5.
     
    TorchedSEO, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  15. ewc21

    ewc21 Peon

    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    I think .edu and PR share the same property: both are overhyped and not as good as advertised.

    Obviously, links are not built the same so the number of backlinks from edu vs com/net should not be the basis of comparison. It could be because of the content of the site and not because of its domain extension was the reason keywords were ranked well.
     
    ewc21, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  16. ecart

    ecart Peon

    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    PR is overhyped. Links from quality sites in your industry or niche are all you should be looking for. PR is a rookie SEO binkie. Just makes you feel good, that's all.
     
    ecart, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  17. bacanze

    bacanze Peon

    Messages:
    2,419
    Likes Received:
    127
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    Who cares what Matt Cutts said, he is not going to say "yes they are", so every spammer in the known universe would hack & try to get bl on authorative sites.

    Personally I believe a link is more valuable on a authorative website, due to all the other websites linking to it, usually consists of authority websites.
     
    bacanze, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  18. berniemac

    berniemac Peon

    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    .com or .edu... the age old debate. Google Pr is ok measure. I always ask myself "I wonder how many sites with a pr 5 or 6 then how many with higher pr "especially in my niche". Seems to me the higher the pr the more "trusted" the site aka the less that have that similar pr." Edu. extension sites for the most part seem to be packed with unbiased quality content aka the search engine "trust". They don't have any motives (selling something or adsense). Just telling it like it is. Sort of an extension of a text book. Professors seems to be the ones with websites and the sites seem to reflect what they find the most relevant to their topic of interest "Most Trusted". So they fill the need for what everyone wants on the internet and that is looking for information. So I come full circle and say look at the sites to link the .edu site. That should give you an understanding of their "trust". Mimic that content and you should feel the same love that .edu sites get.....I give my thumbs up to helpful content no matter the tld
     
    berniemac, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  19. guia

    guia Banned

    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    guia, Mar 28, 2007 IP
  20. kanwarjot

    kanwarjot Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    283
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #20
    DP is really helping me out in clearing all my doubts..Thanks to all valuable contributors
     
    kanwarjot, Mar 29, 2007 IP