Marine admits to killing 18 unarmed Iraqis, says he would do it again

Because we also attacked Afganistan

 

Afganistan had WMD too?

 

What kind of sick people ('cept those terrorist savages) can kill two yo kid?!? What kind of sick people can rape 14 yo girl!?! (diferent case but it shows that in every army there's a people capable doing sick things)

Reading story about war crime that dude were involved I can't see how can "his whole interview on TV might actually give him the public support to help prove his innocence.". I admire you if you see that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haditha_massacre

 

No, it had terrorists. Why are you idiot liberals being SO DANG CLOSEMINDED???

 

Grow up kid and than let's talk.

 

You are a complete waste of oxygen.

 

You are complete joke.

 

How dare you to call little willy, the General of xbox who is going to save America by political philosophy learned from Science Fiction books a joke?

 

If you don't know why Afghanistan was attacked or if your trying to make out we are stupid for attacking the Taliban, then it's a waste of time even posting a reply to you.

Gworld have you brought an xbox or something, i've seen you mention xbox countless times in just a matter of a few days.

 

He uses them as bait

 

lol you want to tell me that Afghanistan and Iraq was exactly the same cases? It's clear why it was good to take out talibans but you had and have hard time making up and lieing to justify attack on Iraq.
Should I remind you about all lies said and printed in past few years to justify occupation of Iraq?

 

Don't try to lead me as i am not a sheep.

 

He must be so mature. Just look at his posting lately...ccccc

 

I'd like to see just one. Let me know what you come up with.

Are you saying that like gworld, you want the US to pull out so terrorists can take over? In other words, you hate the Iraqi people like gworld?

 

You won't belive in any of that even Bush personaly tells you he lied about anything so I won't waste my time.
All those tons and tons WMD founded in Iraq is enough proof to back up all claims made by your goverment (both dems and reps).

Where did I said that?
When you start something you need to finish it.

 

Gtech can you tell me your definition of "terrorist"?

Terrorists destabilise places over a particular purpose, iraq(some overseas territory considering your hometown) is more destabilized and you have a purpose, so who fits in the definition "terrorist"?

I just wonder your definition for "terrorist", and the reason your army don't fit in it. Is terrorist's definition "Not following what US orders" or something?

 

That's what I thought, you couldn't follow through with your own lie and back it up. Because I know you were not talking about these wmd. You need to focus on a new strategy.

I didn't claim you you said it, I asked you a question. And you used the victim card to avoid answering it. I wonder why?

Popular kitman strategy, I see it all the time. Repeated requests to define something which is already known. I suspect "my Army" terrorizes the people you support. That's a good thing

Here are some other popular strategies you may be interested in. I'm *sure* you know about them

 

I didn't state any side as i support, this is no rugby game. If you look at the situation objectively, there is only 1 side fitting that term, you should have another definition to appoint other people title's like "terrorist" which i want to learn.

You can give your opinion about this instead of referring some subjective source including a document like "Why Islam Is Untrue. The Real Reasons"

Or you can choose to defend your statement "no matter what", patriotizm is respectful, but holding on to a mistake isn't anything like it.

 

lol just like I tought
So your own people lie about it!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2129-2005Jan11.html

But I can understand you: with all those liars you have in Washington it's hard to believe anyone.

I didn't answered?
Check out again.

 

You didn't have to state it, I already know. You've made it clear by attempting to solicit an interpretation of something any reasonable person would already know.

If I look at it objectively (which I do), I know who terrorists are and are not. Calls for definitions are not going to change that.

My opinion is well known and very clear. Yours is not. Think about that and get back to me.