lmfao!!! Dude, my stomach hurts because you make me laugh so much!!! Edwards would break Newt!!! lol!!! He sure did a number on Cheney during the VP debate, didn't he?? Go on a vote for edwards...you and I both know that there is no way that Shrillary will let edwards win...but hey, go ahead, i love seeing the dems split down the middle on which incompetent candidate they will vote for!!!
what a dishonest comment. bush did whatever he wanted for the last 4 years in iraq and look where we are every year worst than the last one. more than 3000 of the troops dead and 20,000 injured. stay the course remmember. why do you think democrats won the mid term election. atleast hold them responsible for their actions. to blame democrats is just a copout
For years I have been saying that Hillary would win the 2008 election. Recently, I have started to question my earlier conclusion. It now looks like Giuliani has a strong chance, as does Obama. I threw up some quick aggregators to watch the fun: Rudy Giuliani for President Hillary Clinton for President Barack Obama for President Ron Paul for President I don't have a site for Edwards, McCain, or any of the fringe candidates other than Ron Paul. None of them have anything interesting to offer to this race, except Ron Paul. I don't think that Dr. Paul has a chance of winning, but his campaign is certainly going to be interesting.
yes newt is going to break. edwards is experienced in dealing with the dishonest people. he is going to make him feel like he is in the witness stand.
Dems won the midterm election because lots of GOP congressmen got out of control....for that, I am thankful, it gave the GOP a wakeup....on the other hand, if the dems were so against Iraq, then why are we still there? If Clinton is so against the war, why has she yet to go back on the fact that she voted for it? Why has she said that the troops will be there for many more years? Face it, you, like most liberals, really don't have a clue or a decent argument...Just for you, I found a website where you can get a clue!!!! thats because he is a dishonest ambulance chaser...takes one to know one...
the number one reason that the people voted for the democrats was war in iraq.hopefully they will get us out but bush is still the president so it is not that easy . i do not support hillary i support john edwards maybe they have to put newt in an ambulance when he is finished with him. take him to a good mental institution to get over his break down.LOL
i think at the end he is going to be the president but if not then either i choose the less of two evils or not vote. it depends what are the choices going to be. he scares you bushies dosen't he
moral revulsion!!! here is a couple of targets for you guliani three wives cheated on one as far as i remmember newt cheated on wife while running after clinton proclaiming morality. why you guys lie to yourself?!! i understand why they lie to you, but why you lie to yourself ?
*coughs* There are always more than 2 presidential Candidates. Vote for the candidate you think will do best (or the least poorly) based on the issues and their voting record and their own personal history (heck, all other things being identical, I'd vote for a PHD holder over someone without any college degree), not 'style' or 'who I think will win'. If the democrats put up Hitler, and the Republicans put up Stalin, and third party x put up Mr. Rodgers... who would you vote for? The sooner people stop voting based on party, and start voting based on the issues, and the person, the sooner we can get rid of the oppressive and corrupt 2 party power structure. On the other hand, if I think the Republican or Democratic candidate is the best one, I'm not going to vote for a 3rd party candidate just because they're a 3rd party candidate.
If you don't like the two-party system, take a look at a dozen random third-part candidates. More often than not you will suddenly discover the value of the two-party system -- it keeps the kook level down. Multi-party systems, as are often seen in the third-world, tend to give lots of political power to fringe groups. This does not tend to lead to good government.
Hi there, I don't know, I don't really follow US politics, but no doubt he/she will settle in fine with the twat which is going to be seated in the UK. I don't know if any of you watch morning television (I can proudly say I do ), but people have been saying Gordon Brown is the next Stalin, and have even been sending in pictures of Stalin with Gordon Brown's head . I don't think US or UK politics will even get better to tell you the truth. Regards, Kieran Taylor.
as i said my choice would be edwards if he is not a nominee i have to choose from some one that i really don't like so i have to choose the one that i dislike less. i don't vote third party candidates because i think my vote will have no effect ofcourse if there is a third party that has a chance of winning then that is a diffrent story
Hi there, I don't get what you mean by that? You mean people think our country is turing communist? Regards, Kieran Taylor.
How does AGS know the illuminati selected Clinton in 2008? If its a super secret society, how did AGS get on their mailing list?
I mean that the words and actions of these people tell us a lot about them, but they do not tell us anything about Gordon Brown.