AGS is going to love this...this is by far the most whacked out theory to date...surprised this didn't come from AGS... http://www.rosie.com/blog/2007/03/15/wtc-7/
being the most stupid and unbelievable...I have to admit AGS has had some good ones, but this one takes the cake.
What you talking about man this is old news. I thought when I read the thread title it was going to be one of the dumb idiotic pod theorys that were/are flying around (pardon the pun ) This is exposing the real smoking gun because WTC7 IS the real smoking gun.
Never heard that there was molten steel in the WTC7 building I might also add this theory to the thread.. http://loosetrains911.blogspot.com/ Seriously, what's the difference between these theories and yours? What made you to sort out the pod theory, but keeping to the WTC7 demolition theory that has been debunked 100 times. You keep saying that WTC7 is a smoking gun. Yet, you're not willing to discuss it. Is it perhaps because you, deep inside, knows that the theory can't stand up to criticism?
Oh no not again latehorn. It is patently obvious that you actually believe the official fairytale story of what happened on that day and I do not have the time, or the inclination to get into a worthless debate with you. You carry on believing mate. I will have my own beliefs too. If the official story makes you feel comfortable even thogh Bush's actions since then have killed thosands upon thousands of innocent people and spread even more hatred towards the US then that is your perogative.
But more embarrassingly, you actually believe in the conspiracy fairy tale myths created by others to generate profit, that tell you what to think. And to top it off, this is despite the fact that people like latehorn and lorien have provided, time and again, irrefutable evidence that has left you utterly speachless in threads. These are not the actions of a person capable of determining the difference between what is real and what is not. This is delusion.
Maybe AGS is really Rosie in drag...oh wait, maybe thats the other way around....no, Rosie is a man, so it must be AGS that is in drag....
A whole heap of evidence went down with WTC7, that is why it is the biggest smoking gun. The building simply had to be destroyed at all costs, even though other buildings closer to the twin towers were absolutely annihilated they still remained standing. The sheeple just don't get it though because they prefer not to think too much about it and follw the original fairytale story simply because it is easier to do so.
AGS, you keep ignoring the special construction that went into WTC 7 (or don't care). It was built on top of a subway terminal, so it less internal supports than other buildings, which meant it could take less damage in order to fall. You also ignore the damage it took when the other towers fell which was significant. Or, as I said, you don't care. It's probably the latter. Keep grinding that axe, AGS. You make no sense.
What's the problem? Why can't you discuss the stuff you bring up? I believe that 3+3+3=9 while you believe it's 8. You're arguments doesn't add up to anything. How much of your evidence that would indicate a hole in the official story have not been debunked? Answer: ZERO I haven't seen a single hole in the official story so far, therefore I believe it's correct. Especially considering all the energy that has been spent on finding holes. Why is the debate worthless? This is a forum intended for discussion, don't post if you don't want to discuss. It's not comfortable to believe in the official story at all. Why do you think that? Bush actions.. attacking Afghanistan was justified. Iraq was a risky bet, the plan was to disarm Saddam from the WMDs and then withdraw quicker than they did, no WMDs that fitted the specification were found and too much conflicts(mainly between Iraqi civilians) delayed positive development. But just because the Iraq war is still going on doesn't mean that 9/11 was an inside job.
AGS comment actually gives good insight into his thought process. If he's accusing you (us) of being comfortable with Bush's actions; then he's uncomfortable with it (the converse), which probably led to his belief that 9/11 was an inside job. Since he doesn't want come out and say "the US shouldn't have defended itself" - its easier for him to say "It was an inside job and the US used it to attack Afghanistan". I'm pretty proud of AGS for admitting why he believes as he does. Give him credit, Latehorn.
Yes, I think there's an hidden agende that drives AGS into posting the crap. He doesn't seem interested in the details since he refuse to discuss it. I have stopped counting how many times I've debunked his demolition theories. He stop discussing it, but then he pops up a few days/weeks later just to bring up his old WTC7 claim. Can it be because he thinks so simple that it was a CD just because no plane hit that tower? Or that he has strong anti-american(he's both anti-bush and anti-clinton) feelings? Let's see if AGS can answer these questions..
Its called money....these people have to make a living by charging angry young white males to listen to the crap...very much like a pyramid scheme...
But AGS doesn't make any money by posting this right now. Sure, AGS is a BS-consumer. But after talking about the WTC7 collapse so much, he had the chance to respond to the debunking, which he didn't. Instead he just repeats himself over and over like a parrot.