I want to make some friendly urls using more than one word. Which is better? first-word.html or first_word.html In the first example could this not be interpreted as being minus the word 'word' as you would input into a search engine?
i agree with uttoransen, firstword.html is the best.. but if its a big word it would be better to include the - hyphen ,, rather than the underscore _
Considering it's a phrase but not a single word? http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/
first-word.html is better because underscore will be ignored in SE. Thus SE will see first_word as one word, not 2 words.
* first-word.html : google will think , this page is related first and word * first_word.html : google will think , this page is related only first_word
HYPHEN gets my vote...just read an article on this.... if you query "los_angeles_doctor" in google, and then "los-angeles-doctor", you will get strikingly different results, the latter, with the hyphens, being of MUCH better quality.....
I was reading the article.. whahaha though i tested some queries and saw G can seperate words connected with underscore as well
I'll go with the hyphen than underscore. Both is considered as two words but hyphen is the better choice
I wouldn't be so sure about that look: http://www.google.com/search?q=darmowe+javascripts&hl=pl&lr=&rlz=1T4GGLJ_plUS212US212&start=10&sa=N I do not use underscore any more but some of my old sites (i.e. above example) still score and apparently G can see it as a separate words.
Is there a problem with using + I use + in some of my URLs. Like this : http://www.invision-gaming.co.uk/news/Game Servers/104-New+CSS+Update.html invision-gaming.co.uk/news/Game%20Servers/104-New+CSS+Update.html
lol,interesting. This is the first time that I see people use + in url's. I'm not sure if it's good though.