In 6 days the UK government will vote to build a new nuclear bomb. While the world unit against Iran building nukes, why is it ok for other to do so? Not that I support Iran for this, but the irony is that some people give themselves the right to do what they don’t allow others to do. Israel, USA and now UK are good examples for this. Interesting read : http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2007/03/08/uk-government-plans-new-nuclear-bomb/
Uh...there is a difference between the UK having nukes and Iran. First of all Iran hates a lot of the world, and would actually use the nukes when its uneccessary. They have stated that if they got their hands on nukes they would bomb Israel. Hence, UK can have nukes but Iran can't.
I wrote about this on my personal blog not long ago. The thing is that Britain has always had these weapons - they and the French were at the forefront of nuclear research and technology and have proven themselves as a responsible nuclear power - you can't uninvent the wheel as much as some people may like to. What sort of message does it send to the rest of the World if the UK, who has had these weapons for the last 70-odd years, decides to disarm at the same time Iran and North Korea are flouting international law by developing their own nuclear programmes? If we didn't have it already I would agree with you, but as it is it is a hugely effective deterrent - so effective it has never needed to be used.
Iran isn't exactly a democracy. Plus, they promise to vaporize Israel if given the chance. You don't exactly have the British threatening anyone, so there is a huge difference between a responsible government with nukes than a nation that is bent on wreaking havoc in the middle east.
can someone plz remind me ... because i have some probleme with memory .. Who since the begin of humanity used WMD On people ?
What?! You don't know? Then read your history books or quit acting coy. As if the two situations could possibly be compared...
Oh, yeah...as if the Japanese were going to be beat any other way and as if we're eager to nuke someone else. Okay, maybe Iran...
What is the difference between your sick mind and the Sick mind of a terrorist ? It's ok for you to kill million of people just to say "we beat them" The F****** Terrorists who made the 9/11 had the same thinking , they said the only way to beat USA is to attack there economy and attack civilian . U are worse , they killed 3k and its ok for them , for you , you dont accept less than 1 million . Shame on your stupid brain , what a sick world we are living in .
Depends if the vote goes aswell. And its if new submarines should be developed not a nuclear bomb as such.
I'd like to know that answer, Commandos? What's the difference? You claim you are against hezbollah, but defend them at every opportunity. Most people have enough common sense to know that countries that currently do (or are speculated to have) nuclear weapons are not going around threatening other countries to use them. There's no question that muslims want Iran to have nuclear weapons to wipe out Israel. Nothing more than a one-tracked mind that runs parallel with the quran.
Nope. So what's your point? Are you implying something? Wow, a bad word about terrorists. 'bout time! Wait a minute, I thought you voted for America to lose - which is it? See here folks, is a perfect example of a liberal changing his opinion to fit the context of the situation he's dealing with. His values and morals are as flimsy as the next person to talk about politics, which makes people of this type about as stable as a house made out of liquid water. I can't help but notice the elementary level of your spelling. How old *are* you anyway? If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem
The UK is capable of using these weapons only when absolutely necessary (in fact you could almost say they will never be used), Iran is not capable of using these weapons only when absolutely necessary as they would be in the hands of the dangerous leaders/government that Iran has, people will argue that Iran will not use them, has no intention to use them or that it's unfair that other countries can have them & Iran can't, but if those same people lived in Isreal then would quickly change their tune.
if there is bad & evil , i go with the less damaging , less evil ... uhhh ... yeah and i didn't change , i would never want to see The Miserable Failure Bush in a wining position ...i know he will never win , he was a failure in management be4 presidency and still a failure during & after . and you can say what ever you want about my spelling , English is not my primary nor my second language so ... u know what to do
Why are you bringing up Bush? I'm talking about America here. Do you make a distinction? Also, what about what GTech said about how you defend Hezbullah even though you claim you are against them? Do you have ANY basis for your morals? Oh. Okay. In that case, I guess you have a good excuse. My bad. What's your first language, just outa curiosity?
because its bush war , not america war and i'm ver happy to see that the gov. is standing in his face now . and also proud to see that the miserable is very down in stats.
Iran is not going to use the bomb on Israel, lol. The whole thing is, that once Iran has the nuclear bomb. Then the US will surely never invade either Syria and Iran.