And are easily outed by AGS to-boot. I think if I were a covert government agent and AGS was able to out (or outwit) me, I'd kill myself.
Who said I was talking about you? This is one of the busiest webmaster forums in the world today - it would be foolish for the spymasters to ignore it.
AGS you better move, they are out to get you for sure. Where a tinfoil hat and keep your cellphone off and battery out while you move. You should do something to change your identity maybe even shave off some wool so they won't recognize you. RUN while you still can! I think they have arrested everyone over at loosechange already!
Isn't this the height of paranoia. Assigning a motivation/action to someone - they MUST be spying on this forum. Then, in the next breath, blaming them for doing that something, even though you don't know that they are doing it. Weird, man.
I'm not saying they are spying on the forums or any other forums - what I'm saying is that it would be neglecting their duty as intelligence agencies if the did not pay close attention to these (and other) forums.
Well, I assumed you refered to the debunkers. I just wanted to make sure that just because the debunks are coming from a spy, doesn't directly make them lies. Who's the spymasters? Don't you think they have more important stuff to do than talking with webmasters? Why are so many believing in this bogus conspiracy then? Why are so many hating Bush and other western leaders?
They may have software to filter out the suspicious texts/mails/phone-calls but I doubt that they have any orders to discuss here. Why should they do it? Why is it important? Any signs that they do it? Ok, let's take an example.. I've been discussing 9/11 with AGS for more than a half year now.. no signs of improvement, he refuse to listen to the facts presented for him.
In all fairness the main thing that controls the sheeple is the mainstream media. The mainstream media are told what to tell the people, they often just report it as fact often without even checking to see if it's true. If the public ignored the mainstream media then the whole thing would fall apart like the big lie that it is. There is still hope for all you sheeple, all you have to do is open your eyes.
Thats funny...since most of the "sheeple" ignore the biased media altogether...NBC nightly news has lost over 570k viewers, cbs over 170k...whats even funnier is this is the NIGHTLY news, which does not compete with the cable news...
Something that you should do more often. I have a questions for the video you posted.. Why is the timeformats believed to be EST and BST instead of EDT and GMT? I mean.. isn't it summer time in New York on 9/11? Isn't BBC World using GMT instead of BST since it's international? Uhm.. I've yet seen no debunking on mainstream media(except for BBC:s conspiracy files). The media is mostly making up conspiracies.. (that's why you can see so many links to mainstream media articles on prison planets site). If you want us to believe you, all you have to do is to hand out evidence, debunk the debunks and answer our posts.
It is timestamped at just before 10pm British time, that is 5 hours ahead of New York time. The woman and studio anchor (or is that wanker?) are both reporting that WTC7 has collapsed yet the building can still be seen over the shoulder of the female newsreader still standing. Why were the BBC reporting that it had collapsed a full 26 minutes before it did mate?
he couldn't...the government monitors you from your TV...they can tell what you are doing...besides, doesn't all the tinfoil block signals?
I was actually at work mate when the attacks happened but yes when I got home I watched it. That coverage from Beeb World (and 24) shows the woman clearly saying that 7 had collapsed when it was clear as a bell just over her left sholder. What is your point?
My point is that there was a lot of confusion during the live coverage. BBC even states this on the site. There was a lot of stuff reported all day that did not turn out to be true. I doubt the reporter had intimate knowledge of the WTC layout and even knew what or where building 7 was. Saying "she reported it 27 minutes before it happened" and pointing that to conspiracy is shallow and silly, at best. It's kinda sad that it even needs to be pointed out to you, but here I am, doing so. Put yourself in the emotion of the situation and you try to make a newscast with perfect coverage without any errors and see if stands up perfectly 5 years later. There are gonna be mistakes.
LOL you at least managed to get that right mate, blaming Bin Laden was a big one, invading Afghanistan after was another. I think for the first time since I've been here I actually agree with you.
So, as usual, you have no intelligent response to my post? Why do I find this to be the normal occurrence with you?
Never heard of anticipation? I see it all the time on the news, when "big things" are happening. Wanting to be the "first" to report a specific aspect of what's going on, anticipating what's going to happen next. Like in the war that your buds, hezbollah, started with Israel. So eager to make hezbollah victims for hiding behind women and children, they initially reported upwards of 50 dead in one incident. The next day, corrected it to 19 people that hezbollah hid behind to fire on Israel. Happens all the time. Whoopty doo!