Proofs Saddam had no WMD thread. I'll be posting here all the proofs I find about tha

Proofs Saddam had no WMD thread. I'll be posting here all the proofs I find about that. Why? The americans need to wake up and bring the troops ASAP home. There was no justification for this war. The sooner we bring them home the better for all.


.............. faulty warnings about weapons of mass destruction helped President Bush justify the invasion of Iraq. .................

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070301/ap_on_re_as/nuclear_iran_nkorea

 

What did he use to kill all of the Kurds w/ then?

 

I think that shows the ignorance of people....WMD's are not only Nukes, there are many other types of WMD's...like crazy rob said, Saddam used WMD's on the kurds, and there have been tons of them found in iraq...Gtech has the post with all the links...

 

The better for all, or the better for terrorists who want to take over Iraq?

You can start here. Let me know how it works out.

 

WMD's or NOT , that was one tyrannical rule which left the country impoverished. God Bless The USA !!

 

Pakistan have WMDs, and we can deliver them to homeland USA. Attack us.

 

Why? Your government seems to be doing a reasonable job getting rid of the undesirables there.

 

I was taunting.

 

WMD in action as used by Saddam Husain
Gassed mother and baby.

proof that Saddam had and used WMD

 

why does this still matter? You people need to move on...

 

That was like 20 or more years ago. Read this report. This is the official report from the CIA (not from any news agency or tv channel or anything else). Final word on WMDs from CIA.

 

Oh come on they were doing such a good job of hanging themselves.

You should of let if go on for a little while longer.

 

in the 80s everyone was selling arms and dual use to both iran and iraq including US and israel
i posted a video a little while back that powell says iraq has no wmd early 2001
you can find it in youtube if you look

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

http://www.defendingliberty.com/iraqweapons.htm

 

if you really want to know what was going on at the time i can post a link for you the source is 99% to 100% credible and mostly unbiased and very well documented but i have not read all of it yet so i don't know all of its content.

 

Pretty much everyone in the US knows Saddam didn't have WMD.

But guess what...IT'S TOO LATE!

 

hopefully we won't go fast and careless when it comes to iran

 

If you haven't read all of it yet, how can you concluded that in your opinion only, it's credible? Tell me how that works because I could use some skills like that!

If you have to mention it's unbiased, then it's probably biased.

Finally, you don't need my permission to post what you haven't finished reading yet, but deem it's 99% to 100% credible and mostly unbiased and very well documented. Just post it!

Can you predict lottery numbers too?

 

i do not read something to find out if it is credible or not. i look at the source amount of study and the reliability of its sources.
i think this qualifies
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/

 

seems credible to me. And according to this it looks like US have made a big mistake attacking Iraq recently. Saddam could have been a good alliey against Iran. He always hated Iran.