IRAN : We will not stop , and we are ready for WAR

It is far above your IQ level, don't put too much pressure on your little brain.

 

4 posts and no answer....I can keep the count going if you like....however, at 5 I'm going to start calling you a terrorist supporter again.

 

I do not think they will ever say that!

 

Exactly. The excuse of "feel threaten" is just a BS. Specially when you consider that US didn't do anything about North Korea that actually developed a nuclear bomb. USA is acting like a school bully, picking on those who are actually not in a position to be a threat and the world is getting tired of it.

 

yeah im not sure how accurate that statement is. However, if things keep up like they are not, its definitely a possibility.

 

So the US didn't do anything, and now North Korea has voluntarily just given up their program? yeah, those 6 party talks didn't work at all did they...The US was threatened by NK, but was able to achieve a peaceful outcome, which was what the Bush admin said they wanted to do all along...btw, all of NK's rocket show back in July failed, remember? I hardly doubt Iran will be willing to talk.

Edit...wasn't it the clinton admin that gave NK the nuclear tech?

 

gworld, did you want to avoid this intentionally, or was your browser cache not working correctly? Give you the benefit of the doubt here.

Seem like reasonable questions to me, unless someone were trying to avoid them. It's on topic and related to the subject matter. If you don't understand them, I can rewrite them for even better clarity.

 

That was post 5 the terrorist supporter made, and he just seems to be ignoring you...how convenient for him...it must be nice to close your eyes and pretend no one can see you...

 

Now you are changing your question since you didn't like my answer to your previous question.

I have also answered this question before. I don't think that colonial rule will work in this age and time and sooner or later USA has to end the occupation of Iraq. There is 2 alternatives, either help the democratic movements in that country to establish a democratic government that have the support of people so USA can leave in peace or they can continue with the support of their puppet government and the continuation of the war will force USA to leave.

 

But you never answered!!!! Nice try, keep it up though, because you will eventually run out of excuse why you won't answer his question...you love changing the topic, don't you?

 

No, not in the least bit. The first question was to better understand if you support Iran committing genocide against Israel. Which would lead to another question. However, you *somewhat* seemed to have anticipated that (I'll give you kudos there) by elaborating that you didn't support Israel or the US taking premptive action.

You see, you spend so much time defending Iran and attacking Israel, that I could not ascertain if part of your support for Iran included supporting the genocide they have called for against Israel. Apparently there are other things about Iran that drives your die-hard support for them and you just consider killing Jews as a non-issue.

So I had to ask the original question to determine if you supporting killing Jews, since you always defend Iran's actions.

That was to lead to the next question:

Would you prefer Israel to take action before their destruction, or after their destruction?

But in a round about way, you sort of answered that, because you said you didn't support Israel or the US taking pre-emptive action. This suggests that you would rather see Jews killed more than you would rather see Israel or the US prevent such.

So, I had to reword the second question to better understand. And I see you still have not answered it. So, for the sixth (seventh??) time:

I'm not trying to trick you here. If you don't want people to believe you actually do support Iran killing Jews, it's a great opportunity for you to clarify that position. Or, if you would in fact rather see Jews killed in the face of open threats BEFORE they could prevent such an attack, then there's nothing wrong with admitting that, right? After all, you said you were not ashamed of your positions.

 

I prefer to live in a civilized world that is based on the rule of the law and logic and there is no legal principal that justifies preemptive strike, only a school bully attitude.

Let's go back to my previous example of the white girl who feared the black guy. Obviously you can find cases that a white girl has been raped by a black guy, shouldn't we kill all the black men, so we stop the rapes or do you prefer to wait a girl get raped before taking the criminal to the court? Don't you have any sympathy for women? Do you understand how stupid this type of reasoning is? Your preemptive strike is the same logic in the field of international politics.

 

Well Iran is starting an uranium enrichment program that they claim is not for nuclear purposes which is a complete lie. After they get the bomb, they can threaten any country they want with it. With the statements they have made, it is in the best interested of the US and Israel to protect themselves.

 

I didn't ask you want type of world you prefer to live in. I asked you a very simple set of direct questions to better understand why you support a country that calls for genocide of Jews, yet you *claim* you do not support such yourself.

And you chose not to answer them, again. Hey, after seven times of ignoring them, I think I get the hint. What I thought in the first place, but I wanted to give you the opportunity to confirm it first. And, well, your silence and refusal to answer has confirmed.

 

Its all a frightening possibility. I hope they realize it will be a very dirty war indeed. Any war with Iran would require the west to disregard all ethics or come off second best - suicide bombers, child soldiers, this war is likely to have it all.

Hopefully a more back door method can be found by one of the secret services and avoid the lost of millions of lives.

 

I answered your question, if you are too stupid to understand or refuse to understand because it is not suitable to your political agenda of spreading hatred and bigotry, that is not my problem.

 

Agreed. You answered these questions with silence and avoidance:

...confirming who and what you support. That's all I was interested in; knowing who and what you support (I already knew ). Your silence spoke volumes.

BTW, got a huge cache of your bud's weapons:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-iraq-weapons,1,4209707.story?coll=chi-news-hed

Good day for US Soldiers and Iraqis, bad day for gworld and the people he supports.

 

Guys can't you just have a normal conversation?

 

do u think that others islamic nations will join in iran against war ??

 

Syria has to join.. because they have an agreement....
Looks like it's time to pack my bags and move to another country.