You have two choices: Do you want America to WIN or to LOSE? Because one will happen.

I know it is early in the year but since this is coming from Gtech, I would like to nominate his post for the gold prize in the funniest post of 2007 competition.

 

I never supported invasion of IRAQ for varied reasons but the conflict is now between Al-qaida and others. In this scenerio I don't have any other choice but to wish that Bush wins it.

 

Now what in Lose? Lakhs Iraqis are dead and Saddam Hussein and his family is dead too.

Jay

 

At the moment 63.64% on chillums badly worded poll want the USA to win in Iraq. (whatever that means )

Take great comfort that it is around double the current Bush approval rating.

And take a look at this nice slope, you could ski down this.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/6038436.stm

 

what is this "win" or "lose" nonsense. what justifies a win and a loss?? that can't even be decided on. why can't the world just live together, everyone has to be so ignorant and want to kill one another like a bunch of bloody primitive animals

 

I don't care if you're an Imam - I asked you a question. If I can find a single statement in the Qua'aran that advocates peace, will you retract your statement that there is "nothing peaceful about Islam"? Yes or No?

 

Iraq wasn't lead by the terrorists when the US invaded it. Why did the US go there in the first place? FOR OIL

 

Which means you are disappointed there isn't more support for your buds.

Something you couldn't comprehend.

And I gave you my response. Play your cards carefully lest I make you a fool.

Asked and answered. Where is the oil? Do I hear sympathy for terrorists?

Seems like a lot of terrorists supporters exposed themselves in this thread. Most we already knew, some were too ashamed to give their vote, and others stepped up to the plate to let the world know what kind of person they are.

 

the oil is in your car right now. why do you think you buy it for 50% of the price most of the world pays for it?
And NO, I don't support terrorists...I just don't like the fact that the US invade other countrys just because they want their resources. It seems to me that you consider anyone who doesn't support USA a terrorist.

 

It's because there are people in this world, and groups of those people that hate others, and want them to either stop belonging to that group or to die. In many cases, this is because when person A hates person B and wants them to die (or, if possible, switch groups. In case of skin color this isn't really possible), person B begins to hate person A for that, and wants THEM to die, and it leads to a vicious cycle.

 

There must be no war. I want that there must be peace.

If war starts it may be the "Thirld World War".

My option will be "No War".

 

Really? I have Iraqi oil in my car? And which US company do you assert that is in Iraq stealing their oil? I'd love to hear this one!

Since what you claim to not like (the fact that the US invade other countrys just because they want their resources) is based on a false assumption, will you be changing your tune, or will you come up with a new excuse?

I consider those that make excuses for, openly claim support for and give terrorists credit away to others to be terrorist supporters. And there is no doubt there are a number here.

 

Do you have any other questions?

 

How the hell should I know exactly what companyes are extracting oil from Iraq? but what do you think happens with all the oil there? they just leave it there?
you claim that the US didn't invade Iraq for their oil. Then why did they do it?
There were no terrorists in Iraq before the US invasion, they didn't have any nukes as the americans claimed (and then later both the brits and the americans admitted it was a false accusation), it wasn't because Iraq invaded another country because they didn't do it, it wasn't because the americans wanted to "free" the Iraqi population and give them a democratic government because if the US really cared about that they would have also invaded Belarus (they are the last european country that have a totalitarian government), and Cuba (they still have a communist government) and China (they also still have a communist government) and some other countrys that are ruled by dictatoryes.
So, if the US didn't invade Iraq for any of the reasons above why did they do it if not for the oil?

 

So you are now admitting that your initial claim was not based upon any facts that you were aware of and just a guess? Even gworld can't show where the oil is or what oil companies are stealing oil from Iraq.

Covered many times:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=2017595&postcount=252

zarqawi and a group he was training were in Iraq prior to the invasion. This was also confirmed during a Jordan trial of men working for zarqawi that were caught with chemical wmd in a plot to kill an estimated 80,000 people. In additiona, saddam supported terrorists. $25,000 to families whose member sought virgins by killing Jews in Israel.

Do you have a source where "the Americans" claimed he had nukes? Or were you talking about WMD in general? Perhaps you were thinking of saddams nuclear details posted on a website last year that the NY Times and Washington Post reported on? Oddly enough, they were trying to make the administration look bad for doing so, but in the process exposed that saddam did in fact have plans and capabilities to construct such.

Still, I'd like to see what US companies are stealing Iraqi Oil. gworld too the time to confirm that he couldn't find any. Do facts matter, or are we confirming what I continue to say...that for some, facts don't matter, only their message matters. If I have Iraqi oil in my car, as you suggested, I want to know what company is stealing it.

 

You can't possibly tell exactly what companys take the oil from Iraq because those companys don't really want their name to be associated with taking oil from Iraq and you can't really keep track where each gallon of oil comes from. But what do you think happens to the Iraqi oil? And why do you think you pay 50% of the price for gas most of the world pays? You keep avoiding answering my questions.

Also, can you prove the Iraqs were giving "$25,000 to families whose member sought virgins by killing Jews in Israel." ?

 

Not true, you are very narrow minded seeing things as only black and white. Check the shades man.

 

So you admit you were wrong? That you can't find a single US based Oil Company who is stealing oil out of Iraq? Does that mean you retract that statement, or do facts not matter to you?

I didn't say "the Iraqis" I said saddam. But yes, it's a "no brainer" :

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3346238,00.html

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/06/time.saddam/index.html

You ignored this one. Intentional, or accidental?

 

please give detail of our 50% off oil prices (without taxes) compared to others full price oil (again without taxes, etc..)

Also, you may want to see what someone in Iraq pays for gas or a few other oil producing countries.

-- proving what happens and what is offered to suicide/homicidal bombers families may be two different things. How do we know if they stick to their word - I don't find honesty to be a key thing for these psychopaths.

 

Can't you read? I have even made it bold in the text.

Crude Designs: The Rip-Off of Iraq’s Oil Wealth